The high school student who is running the page clearly has more sense
than they and the lawyers (and why don't they run their own YouTube page).
No, fair use isn't limited to three second clips.
And Jason surely knows more than whatever lawyers they have sending
threatening letters.
He
fyi, this person has joined this group today
more conversation here ...
http://lanbui.com/2007/12/24/how-to-keep-a-high-star-rating-on-youtube/
On Dec 27, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Heath wrote:
Um...I'm not sure why I got this email, but I did, so I thought I
would pass it along but it was sent
yay!
thank you john for not sitting down on the job!
i am really looking forward to see how this turns out
really, i just think rhyming crustacean with vacation is all i care
about and i am trying to protect the rhyme LOL
jason, as always, u da bomb
On Dec 25, 2007 11:43 PM, ractalfece [EMAIL
A lawyer who is an expert in copyright law and online free speech has
offered to represent me pro bono! And it all happened because I
started talking about on this list and Irina forwarded it to Jason
Schultz at LawGeek who is now representing me. I can't thank everybody
enough. File this
so much for living in the now :)
On Dec 24, 2007, at 12:20 AM, ractalfece wrote:
Otherwise, she will hunt me down, her team is researching my website
server right now to have it shut down. She will ask youtube to delete
my entire account. She says she will begin a two year legal battle.
Well, the good news is I worked out a compromise. The bad news is the
video I just spent 10+ hours working on will never be posted.
She wants me to sever all connection to her from the video, remove her
name, the metatags and the youtube response connection so that nobody
watching her
John yep, definitely , your version is so damn hilarious-keep on...I am
still laughing
JohnDkar
www.youtube.com/johndkar
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
A remix can be fair use (Dara Birnbaum's work
starting in the late 70s is just one example. here is one of her pieces
and more are under related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2jwkf-sQTWAfeature=related )
the sites I included have good explanations of fair use.
--
Steve Rhodes
Unfortunately only a judge or jury ultimately gets to decide what's
fair use, which means the person without the in house legal team is at
the mercy of the person with legal resources regardless of who's right
and who's wrong. Follow Steve's links above for the nitty gritty. This
seems like an
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 11:11 am, Jay dedman wrote:
All the stories I hear make it seem like the video hosts' have no
choice but to take down any video that is someone asks.
They don't have to, but they do most of the time in the name of rear-end
coverage. You do have a recourse to fight a
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 10:49 am, Brook Hinton wrote:
Unfortunately only a judge or jury ultimately gets to decide what's
fair use, which means the person without the in house legal team is at
the mercy of the person with legal resources regardless of who's right
and who's wrong.
Brook is dead on
They don't have to, but they do most of the time in the name of rear-end
coverage. You do have a recourse to fight a takedown in writing, and
challenging in writing typically causes the host to review the material
... I used this once with YouTube to get the Stormtroopers Gone Wild
video
Which brings up another point, my video was posted as a video
response. I re-read their original message (from July 14th) after I
posted my response. We aren't going to authorize it to be posted to
our own video in connection, though, just to let you know, but we are
happy to let you use
Oh, man. You need to send Bonny out to interview Christine Breese on
the subject of Monkey Mind. It would truly be the Greatest Thing Ever. ;)
Lan, please do this. they can mind meld.
Jay
--
http://jaydedman.com
917 371 6790
Video: http://ryanishungry.com
Twitter:
14 matches
Mail list logo
