Friday, December 29, 2006, 7:01:55 PM, J. Rhett Aultman wrote:
Another interesting question to pose has to do with the regulation of
money going to political ads. Does this even extend to the Internet? Can
political candidates exploit lapses in campaign expenditure regulation to
pay video
Another interesting question to pose has to do with the regulation of
money going to political ads. Does this even extend to the Internet? Can
political candidates exploit lapses in campaign expenditure regulation to
pay video bloggers for time on their blogs? What about advertisement
storms
Traditionally, the legal rationale behind regulating broadcast TV is
that broadcast spectrum is a finite and very limited resource which
can only accommodate a relatively small number of channels (or radio
stations, for that matter). Hence the government has to step in and
make sure the
I think it was Kafka who said that the liberation of all revolutions
ultimately results in its own aristocracy and the bureaucracy to defend
it. See also George Orwell.
Me? I'll just have a drink and go find some kids doing capoeira to video.
It's less depressing. :)
--
Rhett.
Well, that's the beauty of Internet video. If you think there's a
real issue to address, go out and address it. Nobody's stopping you.
On Dec 29, 2006, at 3:03 PM, Heath wrote:
But I did think that part of the equal time has merits, because it
does ensure (in theory) that all sides can be
