RE: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-02 Thread Randy Mann
if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? if im wearing a nike shirt does that make my video a tm issue?? if i do a video blog in my car and the radio has a song on is that a copy rite

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-02 Thread Michael Ridley
On 12/2/05, Randy Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? No, although depending on your characterization if it as crap it may be slander or

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-02 Thread Randolfe Wicker
mmortality InstituteHoboken, NJhttp://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/201-656-3280 - Original Message - From: Randy Mann To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 6:41 AM Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken o

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-02 Thread Wong Teck Jung
: Friday, December 02, 2005 6:41 AM Subject: RE: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive if that is the case, then what happens when sony gets mad at me for smashing one of there tvs and calling it crap. would that be a trade mark issue?? if im wearing a nike shirt does

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-01 Thread Joan Khoo
I would think that it would be fair use. But Mattel seems lawsuit-happy so I wouldn't risk it. It really turned me off Barbies to read up on all those lawsuits. They seem to have a lousy sense of humour. Joan On 12/1/05, Michael Ridley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not an IP attorney but I

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-12-01 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
Fair Use related to Copyright Law, not Trademark Law. - Andreas On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 11:49:35 +0100, Joan Khoo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would think that it would be fair use. But Mattel seems lawsuit-happy so I wouldn't risk it. It really turned me off Barbies to read up on all those

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Randolfe Wicker
I thought the viewpoint expressed implied that "all males" were so low that they resorted to weird rubber dolls, etc. I doubt one in a hundred men have even experimented with one of these things. Now, an interesting vlog would be opening a "doll house" whorehouse. Could they bust someone

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Randolfe Wicker
I concede the point. I didn't know that infringement of Barbie's copyright would be the real issue. But, even on that level, I wonder if an argument couldn't be made for setting up some site in China or somewhere that was really free of "copyright" constraints. I understand people deserve

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Lucas Gonze
There are three issues -- That Peaches number is definitely unauthorized. The sexual content is going to piss some people off. Barbie is a fiercely protected trademark. The Peaches issue is a good enough reason to bounce it, add in the other two issues and it's an obvious choice.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

2005-11-30 Thread Ronen
Archive.org will pull content which may be a copyright issue based on protest. (Specific proof / discourse not required)On 12/1/05, Lucas Gonze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are three issues -- That Peaches number is definitely unauthorized. The sexual content is going to piss some