I thought the viewpoint expressed implied that "all males" were so low that they resorted to weird rubber dolls, etc.  I doubt one in a hundred men have even experimented with one of these things.
 
Now, an interesting vlog would be opening a "doll house" whorehouse. Could they bust someone for "pimping" and renting out time with the doll he owned?  Now, that would be "police action" worth filming :).  Imagine someone being taken away in cuffs by one cop while another follows with the confiscated "doll" evidence under his/her arm.
 
 
Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
 
Videographer, Writer, Activist
Advisor: The Immortality Institute
Hoboken, NJ
http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/
201-656-3280
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Enric
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2005 4:55 PM
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: my video got taken off archive

--- In [email protected], Paul Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]...>
wrote:
>
> Oh come on Randy It's only a Barbie doll with no clothes on!!
>
> Paul k

There's manufacturing consent and there's manufacturing dissent.

   ;)

> On 30 Nov 2005, at 21:12, Randolfe Wicker wrote:
>
> > Is this the "Internet Archive" that claims to be capturing "the 
> > history of our day?"  Aren't sexual issues part of that history?
> > It is really outrageous that they took your vlog off.  And, I say 
> > that, as someone who doesn't fully agree with your viewpoint.Â
> > Â
> > Actually, I watched this vlog and I felt it treated men
unfairly.  It 
> > made me mad.  That is good.  Something that provokes you and 
> > challenges you to think is good whether you like it or not.
> > Â
> > Randolfe (Randy) Wicker
> > Â
> > Videographer, Writer, Activist
> > Advisor: The Immortality Institute
> > Hoboken, NJ
> > http://www.randywickerreporting.blogspot.com/
> > 201-656-3280
> > Â
> > Â
> >> ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: Aimee Buyea
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2005 5:09 PM
> >> Subject: [videoblogging] my video got taken off archive
> >>
> >> well i guess my work on gender issues is a little too
> >> provocative.
> >>
> >>
> >> "Dear Patron:
> >>
> >> You recently uploaded an item to one of our
> >> collections. Curators had
> >> to remove it, possibly due to one of the following
> >> reasons:
> >>
> >> -Rights status unclear
> >> -Rights status appears inappropriate for our
> >> collections
> >> -Inappropriate content (eg, pornography)
> >> -Uploader requested the removal
> >> -Item content was empty or broken
> >>
> >> Although we appreciate your willingness to contribute,
> >> we would like
> >> to host only content that rightsholders will permit us
> >> to host. Please
> >> do not attempt to reupload this item. Thanks for your
> >> understanding!
> >>
> >> -an Internet Archive curator"
> >>
> >> check it out!
> >> aimee
> >> http://onegirloneworld.blogspot.com/2005/11/warning-sites-linked-
> >> contain-adult.html
> >>
> >>
> >> SPONSORED LINKS
> >> Individual
> >> Fireant
> >> Typepad
> >> Use
> >>
> >> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
> >>
> >>       ▪        Visit your group "videoblogging" on the web.
> >> Â
> >>       ▪        To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> >> Â [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> Â
> >>       ▪        Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of 
> >> Service.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> Do yourself a favour and Visit my Vlog
>
> http://pjkproductions.blogspot.com
>
> It's worth a laugh and work friendly.
>







SPONSORED LINKS
Individual Fireant Typepad
Use


YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS




Reply via email to