Sheez man, is recycled Monty Python the extent of your humour?
;-)
Waz
]--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mark Day
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Posted by: Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ctgirl812003
YouTubers, in my opinion, are independent media makers� so they
fall
into the us
Sheez man, is recycled Monty Python the extent of your humour?
;-)
Waz
]--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Mark Day
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Posted by: Amanda Congdon [EMAIL PROTECTED] ctgirl812003
YouTubers, in my opinion, are independent media makers� so they
fall
into the us
As a result of what you describe, makeup and set building technology
has shifted. They can't use the old sets with HD. One show I know
tested HD side-by-side with 35mm a number of years back and decided to
stick with 35mm because of those issues. Too much detail would break
the fourth wall given
It's interesting that you mention that. A lot of groups are interested in 24p
because it
makes the video look more like film. That's because you're changing the
refresh rate and
slowing it down to a film rate of 24 whole frames per second vs a television
rate of 60
interlaced fields per
I have joined the 21st century and Santa brought me a video iPod for
Christmas. Some time ago, I upgraded to the latest version of iTunes and it
totally screwed up my system and I had to uninstall and go back to what I
had. Now, it appears that I must have the current versiou of iTunes or I'm
up
I've just discovered I can't even run the iTunes tutorials. NO QuickTime
video will run on my computer now.
On 12/26/06, Bev Sykes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have joined the 21st century and Santa brought me a video iPod for
Christmas. Some time ago, I upgraded to the latest version of
What are the specs on your computer? Processer, operating system,
etc?
Heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Bev Sykes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just discovered I can't even run the iTunes tutorials. NO
QuickTime
video will run on my computer now.
Reinstall Windows?
Bev Sykes wrote:
I have joined the 21st century and Santa brought me a video iPod for
Christmas. Some time ago, I upgraded to the latest version of iTunes
and it
totally screwed up my system and I had to uninstall and go back to what I
had. Now, it appears that I must
When I last updated to QuickTime, it played everything back with a weird
bluish cast to it. Absolutely awful video quality. It got better when I
went into the QuickTime settings and told it not to use DirectX. You
might want to try it.
--
Rhett.
http://www.weatherlight.com/freetime
I have
All -
Been spending time over the past ten days going through every site I listed
on politicalwarez.com and realized that there is almost no way to make this
up-to-date by myself.
BUT - instead of keeping it on my site, I moved it to Pbwiki and set up a
nmber of the pages with each section with
That was awesome!
On 12/23/06, Mike Moon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done folks. Good job.
Mike
http://vlog.mikemoon.net
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
Paul Knight [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi all,
Some of you may remember I asked for
A far cry from where they started earlier this year.
This one should not be missed:
http://video.on.nytimes.com/?fr_story=7f5f12d1d283eab9a377567c6ee362b6cc76ceb7rf=bm
Thanks for all the feedback. I'm on Windows XP and my son figured a
work-around for me; if I open QuickTime in Firefox, it plays fine. Won't
play in Explorer, but I use Firefox as my browser anyway, so at least I can
still see the videos after I make them.
damn upgrades! g
On 12/26/06, [EMAIL
This is good. I usually watch Pogue and the flash photo slide shows in
the NYT. Nice sharing. Once a condo gets built blocks from there, this
crack smoking, mildly schizophrenic homeless guy will surely get
evicted from his cave. Hooray for people who don't have addictions.
Francisco
I've been having difficulty uploading to YT today.
It continuously rejects the video description text.
I tried complaining thriugh their email form, and it rejected that text too.
:(
joly
---
WWWhatsup NYC
LOL, Well put Verdi.
It's definitely a huge improvement. Atleast they've learned something
from the success of youtube.
It's atleast a video in a page, witha bookmarkable and referenceable
url, not a popout window, or some monolithic rich media interface
And they've used flash, which improves
One big thing that would help would be to use some compression settings that
produced video that you could actually see and understand. That thing made
YouTube look like HD.
-Verdi
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Are you referring to ihd.org? If so, I visited the site and there's
really a lack of information. For example, it's a standards
organization with members from Media, Advertising, and Technology.
Who? There are no names attached.
Also, the iHD spec is:
-Shot in HD
-Edited in HD
-Aspect
Microsoft attempts to patent web based RSS aggregation.
http://news.com.com/2100-1012_3-6145636.html
I wrote about it here:
http://mmeiser.com/blog/2006/12/microsoft-patents-web-based_26.html
Also...
***Judge deems direct linking, so called hot linking to videos illegal***
Already blogged about:
http://blog.blip.tv/blog/2006/12/26/direct-linking-to-videos-illegal/
-Original Message-
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Meiser
Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2006 4:48 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
It is hysterical. It's contrary to not only to the very notion of
media, but also contrary to the current momentum of what's going on
web wide.
Not only are all the major video hosting sites encouraging linking and
especially embedding their videos in other webpages, but the business
models such
Seems to be fixed now.
I've been having difficulty uploading to YT today.
It continuously rejects the video description text.
I tried complaining through their email form, and it rejected that text too.
:(
joly
---
In Mike's blog post you can go read the article about this. It says
in part:
U.S. District Judge Sam Lindsay in the northern district of Texas
granted a preliminary injunction against Robert Davis, who operated
Supercrosslive.com and had been providing direct links to the live
audiocasts
I like how this melodramatic cliche of terrorist attacking New York city turns
from a mental yawn into a verbal exclamation when you read further down to see
that it's really just a guise for a horny adult production. I'm no publicist
but maybe you could get right to the point with a tagline
Thanks steve, I overlooked that take on it.
Well written, dumb times three. It reflects poorly on all involved.
I don't see how hot linking to a streaming video vs. a downloadable
one makes much of a difference to the argument.
-Mike
On 12/26/06, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In
I think someone might have posted about this, but in case noone did.
I just added the queen of England's podcast to my list of politicians
who podcast.
http://mefeedia.com/lists/57/
It is only an audio podcast, not a video podcast.
It's also just a podcast of speaches, not a direct or personal
Live streaming broadcast.
That's the thing.
It's like if you streamed a broadcast of a weekend NFL game that's
being broadcast on NBC.
On Dec 26, 2006, at 8:12 PM, Mike Meiser wrote:
I don't see how hot linking to a streaming video vs. a downloadable
one makes much of a difference to the
I watch MotoGP from MotoGP.com. They stream the video LIVE from wherever in
the world
they happen to be racing. Normally that means I'm watching the race @ 8amEST.
live.
Speed Channel (re)broadcasts the race either later that same day or days later.
MotoGP
also archives the files.
Hey all :)
We made some changes at the meef, mainly: you can now see who is
subscribed to a feed. Just go to the feed page and click who is
subscribed. Some subscribers are listed multiple times, working on
that little bug :)
Also, for example this lists of PodTech feeds shows some new stuff to
Hi All,
I made a video commentary on the use of the N-Word. It's here:
http://blip.tv/file/121813
Thanks and Happy Holidays,
Zennie
Hello all.
I ran across a company that is using network marketing to recruit reps
and make sales. What I like most about this company is all the pieces
are there for a video producer/blogger to build not only a following
but earn income by branding their content. The company has a marketing
plan
Well, I like the scratch and sniff test myself.
Just on what you described I have questions. There is a difference
between being a sales rep and a content producer. What are they asking
you to do? If if just being a sales rep then why do you have to give
them money to sell their product/service?
32 matches
Mail list logo
