As you know I would never promote one of my videos unless, of course, I
could find the least possible excuse.
Anyway, with all the discussion around Amanda, ABC, Rocketboom and
everything, I thought I'd let you in on, what I think, is the most important
part of the story.
I'm pretty much the
Been 'watching-from-the-sidelines' for a while and decided to get
involved!
There are a few sound level issues but here's my first vodcast EVER:
http://mediasnackers.com/focus/vodcasts/ - here's the blurb:
The MediaSnackers monthly vodcast is a fifteen minute shot (more or
less) of
Doctor P,
You might want to lighten up a little here, Casey was trying to do something
good, and, believe me, I know Casey, and she's not dumb.
For the record, you also might note in inconvenient truth they site
statistics about how a large percentage of the warmest years on record have
been in
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, DK [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Been 'watching-from-the-sidelines' for a while and decided to get
involved!
There are a few sound level issues but here's my first vodcast EVER:
http://mediasnackers.com/focus/vodcasts/ - here's the blurb:
The
I would love to offer a slightly larger size video on my West Michigan blog,
but often when i go any larger than 320x240, I get interlacing lines in my
video... I want to keep my horizontal dimension no larger than 420 how do i
go about doing this.. and what are good dimensions? I use either 3ivx
I don't know how many of you like to look at other people's home office
setups, but I love it. My pics do show a little of our recording area
(audio), but for camera work I just stick a tripod up so I didn't include
that part.
Anyway, if you are a voyeur like me, maybe you'll enjoy viewing my
Well, not really stop motion... but take a peek at
http://davidleeking.com/etc/2007/01/stop-motion-talking.html
I'm filming me saying one word at a time, and making sentences out of it.
It's HARD!!!
Anyway - thought some of you might get a kick out of this.
--
David King
davidleeking.com -
If I may suggest.
I am no expert on video encoding techniques, but I would consider
myself an expert on playback and user experience. For exmaple I would
recommend flash playback for in the browser if possible, and MP4 as
your primary video format for compatibility with the most computers,
I would be interested but I do not know where I will be living come
April
heath
http://batmangeek7.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wow... anyone? Anyone at all?
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Susan kitykity@ wrote:
Happy
cor blimey, josh!!! compress to ipod settings then save as a
quicktime .mov, its much easier and comes out at 640x480.
Alternatively just alter the size in the custom settings in quicktime
to what ever size you want. 425x335 is also a good size which is a
bit in the middle.
On 8 Jan
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I may suggest.
I am no expert on video encoding techniques, but I would consider
myself an expert on playback and user experience. For exmaple I would
recommend flash playback for in the browser if possible, and MP4 as
your
Where do people stand on framerate these days? Whilst I find 15fps is
ok for certain kinds of contents, it noticably spoils the experience
for me when there is lots of movement going on.
Anybody know what framerate much of the flash-reencoded footage ends
up as from the likes of blip.tv etc?
I would be interested but I do not know where I will be living come
April
That's exactly what I was going to answer. We are moving, but not sure
where, so I am also not sure where we'll be.
Robyn
From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of
Where do people stand on framerate these days? Whilst I find 15fps is
ok for certain kinds of contents, it noticably spoils the experience
for me when there is lots of movement going on.
Anybody know what framerate much of the flash-reencoded footage ends
up as from the likes of blip.tv etc?
I uploaded a video about this weekend's Three Kings' Day Parade to Current
TV, and it was
accepted for voting! :D Now I get to see if I get enough votes to get it on
the actual channel,
hehe :D
http://reelsolid.tv/2007/01/08/current-tv/
--
Bill C.
http://ReelSolid.TV
Welcome, always room for one more.
Do you or your company have a blog/vlog that we can check out?
Gena
http://outonthestoop.blogspot.com
http://pcclibtech.blogspot.com
http://voxmedia.org/wiki/Video
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andres Palmiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My name's
Those do seem quite good.
I suppose there may be other factors which make some of the 15fps
stuff Ive seen seem much more jerky than your videos, Ive never worked
out why I seem to notice it more with certain videos, and be put off
it, and not others. I guess 15fps might be slightly less
I used to have QuickTime Pro, but when QT forced me to upgrade, it also took
away my pro and I can't afford to pay $30 twice, so QT compression is
something I can no longer use.
On 1/7/07, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Den 08.01.2007 kl. 00:47 skrev Gromik Tohoku [EMAIL
The issue with 15/30fps is not just file size. CPU utilization is also
a concern. H.264 and On2 VP6 (Flash 8 video) are extremely
CPU-intensive, and other codecs are as well but to a lesser extent.
Going from 15 to 30 fps doubles your CPU utilization on decompression.
-Original
Wow! What a difference...
I checked my cpu usage on each playing in QTPro and there was a
difference: 29.97 fps ran @ 23-25MB and 15 fps ran @ 21-22.5MB -
fairly negligible on my machines...
I wonder if will have greater impact on other people's machines.
The entire tone of the video was
20 matches
Mail list logo
