Without the pretty face to watch reading the news, it'd be better
served as a podcast. Some of these news vlogs don't even show
anything else.
No matter the attractiveness, it gets a little old watching someone
talk in front of the same set every day.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com,
Can't criticism just be an open and free opinion?
I'm a longtime vlog watcher (not a vlogger) and new to this forum...
After reading the last few weeks worth of posts, it seems like many of
the members are very sensative and defensive.
It is a very generalized idea, but I think many would agree
Not sure the point of this, but I'm assuming it is the podcast means
audio not video arguemnt.
Yet Yahoo has video podcasts in this directory too, so I'm not sure
what this proves.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An audio recording posted
It feels good to get validation from one of the most well-respected
Web analysts. This seems to be a reoccuring argument here on the
boards and finally someone gives their expert opinion...
The eyetracking data clearly show that a talking head is boring, even
for 24 seconds. On the Web, 24
This is only the way YOU use these technologies and does not represent
everyone else's needs/desires. There are too many possibilities to go
into, but I find it ironic that you see the value in portable photos
but not video.
The video iPod is only the first attempt at serving a market that is
on, man! But for
what? Help me out, here.
bekah
http://missbhavens.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is only the way YOU use these technologies and does not represent
everyone else's needs/desires. There are too many
The head of the European Publishers Council said consumers were drawn
online by free content but this needed to change.
The value of content must be understood by consumers so that new
business models can evolve.
HA! Gotta love idealists... There is no way that Gen-Y will accept
anything other
Does this site even matter?
http://weblogawards.org/2005/12/best_video_blog.php
It looks like it was created by a couple of randoms, has no backing by
respected outlets and there don't seem to be any prizes for the winners.
Funny the things people do to feel important.
Here are the current
More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which highlights a lot of new vloggers
each episode.
http://stevegarfield.blogs.com/videoblog/vlog_soup/index.html
On Dec 16, 2005, at
It sure does get old reading what is basically the same article. My
resolution for the New Year is to unsubscribe and boycott the
following: Rocketboom, Garfield, Jay/Ryannne, Verdi and Josh Leo.
None of them are great. Sure they're decent, but they sure don't
deserve the hype over anyone else.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am glad there is no single 'Adam Curry' figure of the videoblogging
world. Judging by the sensitivity and flames that can come out of such
discussions by videobloggers on topics such as motive, fame, ego,
money
:
More shameless self-promotion by ManCheeseMo.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
More shameless self-promotion by Garfield.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Plus I sent her to Vlog Soup which
in an article I'm not aware of?
If it was, please send me a link.
-josh
On 12/16/05, ManCheeseMo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uh, how original. What exactly am I promoting? I don't even have a
vlog to promote yet.
My point is that the good ol' boy network gets old. If you are
buddies
On Dec 16, 2005, at 2:09 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:
Watch, now one of the connected moderators will probably ban me
from
this group.
--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
Video Blog - http://stevegarfield.blogs.com
Text Blog - http://offonatangent.blogspot.com
Not quite the idea. I meant that FireANT could take the exising live
build, strip it of the pre-populated feeds and release a 1.0b4
version. There would be no bugs that do not already exisit, which has
nothing to do with the up and coming release. Besides, the whole
issue of pre-populated feeds
on Tuesday at 10:30 at
http://www.davidjr.com/tv
On Dec 16, 2005, at 3:17 PM, ManCheeseMo wrote:
Just look at that footer - Like Paul Revere, leading the media
revlolution? What a joke. First of all Paul Revere didn't lead shit.
--Steve
--
Home Page - http://stevegarfield.com
No, this is what happens when people become overly defensive and look
for a way to publicly ridicule someone.
I'm not sure what anonymity you're talking about. I'm here
communicating with you. Do I need a vlog to have an identity? Would
you rather I give out my full name, social security
Ironic - aren't you being a troll with your witty one-liners?
Oops, now I just fed you. Let's see how fast you bite. ;)
Or maybe we can be men and agree to disagree? I'm tired of getting
flamed. Next topic please!
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Enric [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Feed a
18 matches
Mail list logo
