The universe of audio and video will always have all sorts of lengths, sizes and qualities among its parts. There is no right or wrong on this subject. I do agree shorter is better for a lot of things - especially in this early stage of internet distribution.I so thrilled to have found the
ecomputerd wrote:
And we'll soon see (if you haven't already!) RSS
Video direct to TV.
Where oh where are the MythTV hackers... We need one on this list!
Pete
--
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...
SPONSORED LINKS
So, josh, I would encourage you to think out of the Web ;-)
I can't watch anything longer than 5 minutes anywhere (5 minutes is
really pushing the limits of my attention span), not just on the web.
I won't watch a 28 minute segment on TV, or listen to 28 minutes
straight on the radio
Why not make each of these a separate chunk.
Then I might be able to watch and even link to individual parts of it
rather than tell someone:
you know there's some good stuff from minute 18:30 to 21:10
(Or i could use MeFeedia's new quoting tool: plugging for Peter)
-josh
On 8/8/05,
I don't think its necessary... your target output is TV not the web,
and to re-edit everything would be a big PITA.
But, if your target output was the web then I would definitely say
smaller chunks are better. Maybe even separate blog entries for each
bit so there are permalinks to specific
IA = Internet Archive
On 8/8/05, jmedakev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is IA? Can I embed mp4 and get the quicktime embedded
controller?
Jamie
thekverreport.com
SPONSORED LINKS
Individual
Hi everyone:
At 10:34 PM 8/8/2005, Josh Kinberg wrote:
IA = Internet
Archive
On 8/8/05, jmedakev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is IA? Can I embed mp4 and get the quicktime embedded
controller?
Quicktime 7 does this automatically as if it were an MOV file. But
in order for it to work though,
