Re: [videoblogging] flash or quicktime? Whats better?

2006-04-18 Thread Jen Simmons
Quicktime advantages: - it looks better - it plays back better / less stuttering, much better recovery from a slow internet connection - viewers can drag the playhead back and forth after the movie has downloaded and scrub through the video / land on an exact frame / check out what's going on -

Re: [videoblogging] flash or quicktime? Whats better?

2006-04-18 Thread Jon Rawlinson
Wow!Thanks so much Jen CharlesI appreciate it!cheers,JON.natavillage.orgOn 4/18/06, Jen Simmons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quicktime advantages:- it looks better- it plays back better / less stuttering, much better recovery from aslow internet connection- viewers can drag the playhead back

Re: [videoblogging] flash or quicktime? Whats better?

2006-04-18 Thread Michael Sullivan
Hi,Well, generally speaking both work well on the web as embedded video in a page.The FLV format and codecs have gotten really great in the past year so its possible to have excellent flash video quality. And, most to all people will have no problem viewing an FLV on the web. In most cases, to

Re: [videoblogging] flash or quicktime? Whats better?

2006-04-18 Thread Jon Rawlinson
Yah I havent been very happy with the online transcoding to flash. I think ill just stick with quicktime for now.Thanks for the help!JON.natavillage.org On 4/18/06, Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi,Well, generally speaking both work well on the web as embedded video in a page.The

Re: [videoblogging] flash or quicktime? Whats better?

2006-04-17 Thread Charles Iliya Krempeaux
Hello Jon,On 4/17/06, Jon Rawlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys,What do you think is better embedding a flash video file or a quicktime video file?Can you give me your opinions on both?Thanks so much!Cheers,JON.The Nata village blog natavillage.orgIf I had to choose between the 2, I'd