i was an urging voice in 2004 for Mr. Moore to distribute his works for free
and not profit from the political atmosphere and the war as he was.
i guess he had to make lots more money first before he could be willing to
give his candid films away.
here is a nice open letter to Michael Moore:
hahah of course i'm like oh cool there's a boondocks movie ie
http://www.boondockstv.com/
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.boondockfans.com
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Rupert [EMAIL
PROTECTED]rupert%40fatgirlinohio.org
wrote:
No, obviously
I agree with your insights, Rupert.
YouTube is great for marketing. Not for distribution. Blip.tv is great
for distribution. There's a big difference between the two. Filmmakers
(big and small) understand so much about how to distribute and market
using the old tools. There's lots of pro
http://www.boondockfans.com
On Fri, Sep 5, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Rupert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, obviously it's not a bad thing if a director just doesn't want to
do it. Nobody's forcing anyone. My point - and maybe it was badly
made - is that so many other people in unexpected places are
Awesome!:)
Cant remember the name of the documentary of Troy and the making of the
film, but its brilliant. One of the best onscreen flameouts I've ever seen.
Well worth renting.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 8:32 AM, Sull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.boondockfans.com
On Fri, Sep 5,
Michael Moore is putting out his new film, Slacker Rising, on the web
through blip.tv (for free).
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080905-michael-moore-skips-box-office-film-heads-straight-to-net.html
*Slacker Uprising* details Moore's tour of 62 US cities in an attempt to
rally young
Great news, really.
They begin to 'get it'.
Ha!
Bwah-hahaha.
Yes!
The director of the indie movie I just finished mixing (City Island) is
putting clips from dailies (bloopers such) online on his blog through
YouTube.
Good for Michael Moore. Yes, some of them are starting to get it.
But even the ones who are getting it are only partly getting it, and
- like your director, Jan - are bullied by producers and funders who
are still a long way from getting it.
In May, I was at a talk about the future of
I mean, REALLY - it's now 4-5 years since the people on this list
started mucking about with this stuff.
And Jan's director is unusual in his use of social media and video to
document the production of his independent movie??
Even politicians are now well-versed in using videoblogging and
I don't think its exactly Negative if a director doesnt want to blog his
activites or post dailies onto the web. Maybe the director just wants to
show a finished product; many people are like that.
Kent, you're making a movie (Attack of the Killer Tomatoes!!!), do feel the
need to blog the
No, obviously it's not a bad thing if a director just doesn't want to
do it. Nobody's forcing anyone. My point - and maybe it was badly
made - is that so many other people in unexpected places are using
online video to promote ongoing projects... it seems absurd to me
that filmmakers
11 matches
Mail list logo
