[videoblogging] REPLY: Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-31 Thread quietleader
Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better than .flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality AND smaller file size than H.264 (using the same parameters). For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the back of a moving

Re: [videoblogging] REPLY: Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-31 Thread Michael Sullivan
well, now you also have adobe f4v using h264 codec. On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, quietleader war...@schirtzinger.comwrote: Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better than .flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality AND smaller

Re: [videoblogging] REPLY: Promoting the .mov option online

2009-03-31 Thread Adrian Miles
do you mean when you also turn auto keyframes on in QuickTime rather than manual keyframes you get better and smaller using flv? Or are you comparing auto keyframes to manual keyframes? On 01/04/2009, at 6:06 AM, quietleader wrote: For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the