Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better than
.flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality AND
smaller file size than H.264 (using the same parameters).
For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the back of a moving
well, now you also have adobe f4v using h264 codec.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 3:06 PM, quietleader war...@schirtzinger.comwrote:
Isn't it a bit of an oversimplification to say H.264 is universally better
than .flv? Because I've seen situations where .flv is both better quality
AND smaller
do you mean when you also turn auto keyframes on in QuickTime rather
than manual keyframes you get better and smaller using flv? Or are you
comparing auto keyframes to manual keyframes?
On 01/04/2009, at 6:06 AM, quietleader wrote:
For example, some of the videos I post are filmed from the