Hey guys,
Yes, we do allow people to upload video from cell phones.
Both companies have trademarks pending. We're going to work on it,
and that's about the best I can say right now.
Yours,
Mike
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Joshua Kinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it enough
worse case, change your name to BlipBlip.TV On 1/18/06, mikehudack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys,Yes, we do allow people to upload video from cell phones.Both companies have trademarks pending.We're going to work on it,and that's about the best I can say right now.Yours,
Mike--- In
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
Monika
http://nurse2be.blogspot.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Michael Sullivan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
worse case, change your name to BlipBlip.TV
On 1/18/06, mikehudack [EMAIL
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
famous original Blip.tv
:-)
-Josh
On 1/18/06, monika_lyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or ala the millions of Ray's Pizzas here in NYC:
The original Blip.tv or the famous blip.tv.
Monika
I know and like one of the principals of blip.tv, and I have no idea who these
bliptv.com
folks are, but nowhere in this thread does it explain why people have said or
agreed with
the characterization of bliptv.com as a whore or of its principals as
gigolos.
Can you folks please justify
Deliberately taking on a popular brand name within an industry that
you want to breka into, and then using it for the purposes of
confusing customers into believing that you're the more popular and
reputable company is generally considered whore-worthy.
That was explained in about the second post
i dont know either.i think bliptv.com site is kick ass.blip.tv will eventually have pay services they are a business afterall. the differences will blur somewhat.
whatever.sullOn 1/17/06, Mike Lanza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know and like one of the principals of blip.tv, and I have no
what are the dates of name use and registrations and trademark applications for both?On 1/17/06, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Deliberately taking on a popular brand name within an industry that
you want to breka into, and then using it for the purposes ofconfusing customers into
http://web.archive.org/web/20020924094457/http://bliptv.com/2002On 1/17/06,
Michael Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are the dates of name use and registrations and trademark applications for both?On 1/17/06, Stephanie Bryant
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Deliberately taking on a popular
Well we don't know that they chose their name *after* our beloved
blip.tv did ... we found them much later, but who knows how long they
have been calling themselves that?
services that send video out to cell phones isn't evil, nor is having
a name similar to something else ... (it may be wrong,
unless blip.tv has been doing there thing for 4 years, it appears that bliptv.com has been using the name to some extent related to video since then... the contact people are the same today as they were in 2002... the earliest version of the site i could find.
sullOn 1/17/06, David Meade [EMAIL
Hey guys,
First of all, let me say that we're aware of bliptv.com. I don't
think I should say very much about the issue at the moment, but we're
doing what we can (in regular consultation with our lawyers) to deal
with the situation.
I don't think anyone was out to hurt anyone or otherwise do
Hmmm, well I guess it will remain a mystery to me. I'm using Fedora
Core 4/Linux and haven't figured out how to install the Flash plug-in
which is at the front door of this site.
I have questions about the name, has our Blip.tv been trademarked
protected? Has it been established longer that the
Is it enough separation that one company targets mobile users
and the other is for desktop citizens?
Blip.tv also supports mobile uploads. I wouldn't say its only for
desktop citizens.
-Josh
On 1/17/06, Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, well I guess it will remain a mystery to me. I'm
They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that
leaves me out... heh
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Share [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Saw this today on Craigslist
Blip wants short films
The future is right now!
Cheers Blip.
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
Are they related?
On 1/16/06, Susan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
They don't want films made to entertain children... I guess that
leaves me out... heh
Susan
http://vlog.kitykity.com
--- In
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
They're not. There's the Blip we love and then there's the blip whore who
has a pact with sprint.
- Andreas
--
URL:
http://bliptv.com/On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote: I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we all know and love for hosting.They're not. There's the Blip we love and then
lol ... something tells me you're not a fan of sprint? :-P
On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
OMG! thanks for the clarification on that Andreas.
Had no idea there was an evil blip.
cheers.
s.
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Andreas Haugstrup
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this
I've never had to endure Sprint, but I'm not a fan of companies stealing
the name of other companies. It creates confusion and the blip.tv guys
don't need that.
- Andreas
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:53:07 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
lol ... something tells me you're not a fan
I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name
similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what
trademark exists to prevent.
This Blip whore needs to go!
--Stephanie
On 1/16/06, Andreas Haugstrup [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100,
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:26:23 +0100, Stephanie Bryant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I seriously hope blip.tv has a trademark registration-- the name
similarity IS causing customer confusion, which is exactly what
trademark exists to prevent.
I'm certain the blip.tv guys are all over it. However
i thought we agreed way back when back to try and refer to them as
gigolos ;)
Andreas Haugstrup wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:31:19 +0100, David Meade [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I thought I heard that this company was not the same as the blip we
all know and love for hosting.
24 matches
Mail list logo
