Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-10 Thread Adam Quirk
Does anyone know about using AVCHD in a live environment?  We're thinking
about taking a live feed from the cam's USB2.0 port, routing it through
Adobe's Visual Communicator to key out a green screen, and displaying the
resulting video on a large projection screen.  I'm not sure if this is
possible, either in SD mode from an HD cam, or especially in HD mode with
AVCHD.  I have a feeling I'm just going to have to test the hell out of a
bunch of cameras, and keep receipts.

--

*Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck  Salvage LLC /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m)
/ imbullemhead (aim)


On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Renat Zarbailov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Editing AVCHD on PC natively is now possible without any issues in
 Adobe Premiere CS3 with an add on from Mainconcept called MainConcept
 MPEG Pro HDV 3.1.0.
 You would of course need a fast Intel Core Duo 2 machine with at least
 2.6GHZ processor and 4GB RAM plus RAID0 hard drive configuration.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
  Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
  limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
  supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
  version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an older
  Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
  version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
  last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac Pro
  and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times more
  space than native AVCHD.
 
  For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
 
  Rupert
  http://twittervlog.tv
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
  ottorabbit@ wrote:
  
   Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
  
 

 http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
   Check
   respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
  
 



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Christopher Polack
Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702

The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage. Check  
respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.


[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread ruperthowe
The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.

Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an older
Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac Pro
and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times more
space than native AVCHD.

For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.

Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv 

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -

http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702
 
 

 Check  
 respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread J. N. Pereira
Hi Rupert and everyone,

I can add to this that i already used some months ago a achcd HDD from  
Sony and it was a bit painfull, because you have to mount the hdd or  
at list copy almost everything so that later on FCP 6 can make the log  
and transfer. It transfers by converting it to a codec called AIC  
(intermediate codec) i think, that is the same codec iMovie HD and  
Final Cut Express used for HDV. That codec gives you indeed much  
bigger files.

So for the editing person, HDV natively edited in a intel Mac is much  
much easier. I don't use PC so can't say nothing.

I also used these camera once the sony pc application converted the  
avhcd files to MPEG2/DVD files... then i used MPEG StreamClip to  
convert to FCP6.

Unfortunately i never found out another way to ingest, i thought MPEG  
StreamClip should handle it but i never got to succeed in converting  
the original camera files with it.

At the time the newest iMovie didn't existed... maybe that one could  
be easier, but maybe it uses the AIC also...

the is my experience with avhcd and macs.

Rgds,
ZN



On May 9, 2008, at 12:58 , ruperthowe wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.

 Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
 limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an older
 Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times more
 space than native AVCHD.

 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.

 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -

 http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702



 Check
 respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.







[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Bill Cammack
I encountered this just the other day.

In preparing for a project, I talked to someone bringing a second
camera, who told me they were going to shoot on tape.  I knew how long
the final video was going to be, so I was counting on, let's say, four
times that much space for the raw footage to take up on my MacBook Pro
internal drive.

Unfortunately, even though the video looked sweet from the camera they
brought, the footage was recorded to SD card and I had to use Log 
Transfer to import it into FCP6.  Like Rupert mentions, this resulted
in INSANELY LARGE file sizes that I wasn't prepared for, which were
also a BEAST to edit with, as far as not wanting to play smoothly in
my timeline on a 2.33 GHz Core Duo MBP with 2 gig of ram.

Fortunately for me, I was able to borrow an external drive at the
client site, because the transferred AVCHD had taken up all the space
I had allotted for DV or HDV footage.

Bill Cammack
http://BillCammack.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
 Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
 limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an older
 Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times more
 space than native AVCHD.
 
 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
 
 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 ottorabbit@ wrote:
 
  Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
 

http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
  Check  
  respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
 





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Heath
Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have not 
worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since 
Panasonic uses that as well.  From what I know by checking on fourms, 
etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.  
Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for 
about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run Vegas 
on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
 Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
 limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an 
older
 Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac 
Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times 
more
 space than native AVCHD.
 
 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
 
 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 ottorabbit@ wrote:
 
  Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
 
 http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
  Check  
  respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
 





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread ruperthowe
I hadn't thought about running it with bootcamp.  Good idea.  Thanks!
 I left my PC in London.

And Vegas Movie Studio costs even less than that - it's about $60-70
or £33.  Incredible value for what you get.  

It's a really good editing program for videobloggers - perhaps the
best one out there to meet a hobbyist's needs.  I no longer feel any
need to tell people who are interested in videoblogging and digital
filmmaking that the first thing they should do is go out and spend
thousands of dollars on a Mac and FCP.The advantages of FCP for
the average user do not justify the difference in price between it and
Vegas.

One of the things I like most about it is that it'll cut MP4 files
from a phone or a Xacti without having to import or convert/transcode
them.  And it's better in almost every way than all the other free and
cheap editing programs. Unlike WMM or iMovie 06 (never mind its
bastard child iMovie 08), it allows proper multiple-video-track Non
linear editing.
And in terms of flexibility, format friendliness and ease of use for
beginners, it beats the pants off Final Cut Express.

Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv



--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have not 
 worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since 
 Panasonic uses that as well.  From what I know by checking on fourms, 
 etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.  
 Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for 
 about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run Vegas 
 on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...
 
 Heath
 http://batmangeek.com
 http://heathparks.com
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ wrote:
 
  The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
  
  Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
  limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
  supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
  version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an 
 older
  Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
  version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
  last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac 
 Pro
  and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times 
 more
  space than native AVCHD.
  
  For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
  
  Rupert
  http://twittervlog.tv 
  
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
  ottorabbit@ wrote:
  
   Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
  
  http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
 Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
 HS9_11002_7005702
   
   
  
   Check  
   respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
  
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Ron Watson
Heath, do you have a link for Vegas on Mac?
I'm googling with no luck...
I'll keep trying...

Cheers,

Ron Watson



On May 9, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Heath wrote:

 Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have not
 worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since
 Panasonic uses that as well. From what I know by checking on fourms,
 etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
 Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for
 about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run Vegas
 on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...

 Heath
 http://batmangeek.com
 http://heathparks.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
  Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
  limitations. The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
  supports it, but not the better iMovie 6. If you have an older
  version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck. But then if you have an
 older
  Mac, you're stuck, too. Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
  version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and then was updated
  last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac
 Pro
  and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times
 more
  space than native AVCHD.
 
  For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
 
  Rupert
  http://twittervlog.tv
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
  ottorabbit@ wrote:
  
   Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
  
  http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
 Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
 HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
  Check
   respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
  
 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Richard Amirault
- Original Message - 
From: ruperthowe
(snip)
 And Vegas Movie Studio costs even less than that - it's about $60-70
or £33.  Incredible value for what you get.
(snip)

Understand that there are *two* versions of Sony Vegas Movie Studio. The 
regular version and the slightly more expensive PLATINUM version.  I think 
(not sure) that only the Platinum version works with HD files.

I have the Platinum version and love it (don't work with HD .. yet)

Richard Amirault
Boston, MA, USA
http://n1jdu.org
http://bostonfandom.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ



[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread ruperthowe
It's PC only, Ron - but Heath was suggesting using it on a Mac running
Windows via Bootcamp or Parallels.
Rupert

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Heath, do you have a link for Vegas on Mac?
 I'm googling with no luck...
 I'll keep trying...
 
 Cheers,
 
 Ron Watson
 
 
 
 On May 9, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Heath wrote:
 
  Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have not
  worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since
  Panasonic uses that as well. From what I know by checking on fourms,
  etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
  Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for
  about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run Vegas
  on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...
 
  Heath
  http://batmangeek.com
  http://heathparks.com
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ wrote:
  
   The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
  
   Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
   limitations. The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
   supports it, but not the better iMovie 6. If you have an older
   version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck. But then if you have an
  older
   Mac, you're stuck, too. Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
   version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and then was updated
   last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac
  Pro
   and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times
  more
   space than native AVCHD.
  
   For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
  
   Rupert
   http://twittervlog.tv
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
   ottorabbit@ wrote:
   
Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
   
   http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
  Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
  HS9_11002_7005702
   
   
  
   Check
respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
   
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread J. N. Pereira
Hi Again!



That's a good idea, i will try inside Parallels and windows XP. that's  
a good experiment and it should work.

And i really hope the Mac will catchup somehow with those AVHCD  
cameras that are becoming completely popular. but at the same time,  
the new iMovie is suppose to work ok with them... but i am not so fan  
of that new interface too.

And all those cameras can sound very similar, but don't forget to  
check the bit/data rate and the modes of recording: SD. HD, 4:3, 16:9,  
progressive, interlaced, 24p, 720p, 1080i, 1080p...


Rgds,
ZN


On May 9, 2008, at 15:20 , ruperthowe wrote:

 I hadn't thought about running it with bootcamp.  Good idea.  Thanks!
 I left my PC in London.

 And Vegas Movie Studio costs even less than that - it's about $60-70
 or £33.  Incredible value for what you get.

 It's a really good editing program for videobloggers - perhaps the
 best one out there to meet a hobbyist's needs.  I no longer feel any
 need to tell people who are interested in videoblogging and digital
 filmmaking that the first thing they should do is go out and spend
 thousands of dollars on a Mac and FCP.The advantages of FCP for
 the average user do not justify the difference in price between it and
 Vegas.

 One of the things I like most about it is that it'll cut MP4 files
 from a phone or a Xacti without having to import or convert/transcode
 them.  And it's better in almost every way than all the other free and
 cheap editing programs. Unlike WMM or iMovie 06 (never mind its
 bastard child iMovie 08), it allows proper multiple-video-track Non
 linear editing.
 And in terms of flexibility, format friendliness and ease of use for
 beginners, it beats the pants off Final Cut Express.

 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv



 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have not
 worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since
 Panasonic uses that as well.  From what I know by checking on fourms,
 etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
 Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for
 about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run Vegas
 on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...

 Heath
 http://batmangeek.com
 http://heathparks.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.

 Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
 limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an
 older
 Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac
 Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times
 more
 space than native AVCHD.

 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.

 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 ottorabbit@ wrote:

 Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -

 http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
 Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
 HS9_11002_7005702



 Check
 respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.






 

 Yahoo! Groups Links







[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Heath
Just make sure if  you have an HD camera and plan on getting the 
consumer version of Vegas, that you get Movie Stutio Platium.  That 
is the version that lets you handle HD footage.   They do sell a 
cheaper version of Movie Studio but it doesn't handle HD but the 
price point differance is so small I would just get the Platium 
version.

And Rupert have someone send your PC!  ;)

As a side note, I highly recomend Vegas to anyone.  I love it and 
swear by it.

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I hadn't thought about running it with bootcamp.  Good idea.  
Thanks!
  I left my PC in London.
 
 And Vegas Movie Studio costs even less than that - it's about $60-70
 or £33.  Incredible value for what you get.  
 
 It's a really good editing program for videobloggers - perhaps the
 best one out there to meet a hobbyist's needs.  I no longer feel any
 need to tell people who are interested in videoblogging and digital
 filmmaking that the first thing they should do is go out and spend
 thousands of dollars on a Mac and FCP.The advantages of FCP for
 the average user do not justify the difference in price between it 
and
 Vegas.
 
 One of the things I like most about it is that it'll cut MP4 files
 from a phone or a Xacti without having to import or 
convert/transcode
 them.  And it's better in almost every way than all the other free 
and
 cheap editing programs. Unlike WMM or iMovie 06 (never mind its
 bastard child iMovie 08), it allows proper multiple-video-track Non
 linear editing.
 And in terms of flexibility, format friendliness and ease of use for
 beginners, it beats the pants off Final Cut Express.
 
 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv
 
 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote:
 
  Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I have 
not 
  worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since 
  Panasonic uses that as well.  From what I know by checking on 
fourms, 
  etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.  
  Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio for 
  about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run 
Vegas 
  on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think about...
  
  Heath
  http://batmangeek.com
  http://heathparks.com
  
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ 
wrote:
  
   The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
   
   Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
   limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for 
instance
   supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
   version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have 
an 
  older
   Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the 
latest
   version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was 
updated
   last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a 
Mac 
  Pro
   and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 
times 
  more
   space than native AVCHD.
   
   For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
   
   Rupert
   http://twittervlog.tv 
   
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
   ottorabbit@ wrote:
   
Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
   
   http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
  Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
  HS9_11002_7005702


   
Check  
respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
   
  
 





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Heath
I like Vegas so much that if I do get a Mac, I would still run Vegas 
via bootcamp or Parallels.  I've been using Vegas for over 2 years 
now so if anyone has any questions about it, just let me know.

Heath
http://batmageek.com
http://heathparks.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 It's PC only, Ron - but Heath was suggesting using it on a Mac 
running
 Windows via Bootcamp or Parallels.
 Rupert
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson k9disc@ wrote:
 
  Heath, do you have a link for Vegas on Mac?
  I'm googling with no luck...
  I'll keep trying...
  
  Cheers,
  
  Ron Watson
  
  
  
  On May 9, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Heath wrote:
  
   Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I 
have not
   worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since
   Panasonic uses that as well. From what I know by checking on 
fourms,
   etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
   Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio 
for
   about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run 
Vegas
   on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think 
about...
  
   Heath
   http://batmangeek.com
   http://heathparks.com
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ 
wrote:
   
The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
   
Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but 
with
limitations. The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for 
instance
supports it, but not the better iMovie 6. If you have an older
version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck. But then if you have 
an
   older
Mac, you're stuck, too. Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the 
latest
version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and then was 
updated
last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a 
Mac
   Pro
and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 
times
   more
space than native AVCHD.
   
For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a 
lot.
   
Rupert
http://twittervlog.tv
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
ottorabbit@ wrote:

 Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -

http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
   Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
   HS9_11002_7005702


   
Check
 respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.

   
  
  
   
  
  
  
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Ron Watson
I ran Vegas 3 and 4 back in 2003-2005 then I got a mac.

Hadn't thought about dual booting with XP...

I'm going to be doing some DVD authoring, though, and don't know  
whether or not I want to go back to Vegas.

I mentioned this a while back, but...

I'm looking at a 15 macbook pro (4GB) with FCP Studio.

Not sure how I want to proceed.

Vegas would be cheaper, but then I have to buy a seat of XP, and I  
lose out on 3D and have less options on DVD authoring...

Hmm...

Any thoughts?

Ron Watson



On May 9, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Heath wrote:

 I like Vegas so much that if I do get a Mac, I would still run Vegas
 via bootcamp or Parallels. I've been using Vegas for over 2 years
 now so if anyone has any questions about it, just let me know.

 Heath
 http://batmageek.com
 http://heathparks.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It's PC only, Ron - but Heath was suggesting using it on a Mac
 running
  Windows via Bootcamp or Parallels.
  Rupert
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson k9disc@ wrote:
  
   Heath, do you have a link for Vegas on Mac?
   I'm googling with no luck...
   I'll keep trying...
  
   Cheers,
  
   Ron Watson
  
  
  
   On May 9, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Heath wrote:
  
Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I
 have not
worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, since
Panasonic uses that as well. From what I know by checking on
 fourms,
etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie Studio
 for
about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can run
 Vegas
on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think
 about...
   
Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@
 wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.

 Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but
 with
 limitations. The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for
 instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6. If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck. But then if you have
 an
older
 Mac, you're stuck, too. Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the
 latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and then was
 updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a
 Mac
Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10
 times
more
 space than native AVCHD.

 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a
 lot.

 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 ottorabbit@ wrote:
 
  Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
 
 http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-
Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
HS9_11002_7005702
 
 

 Check
  respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
 

   
   
   
  
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 


 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Heath
It depends on what you want to do, but in Vegas Movie Studio versions 
it comes with a DVD burning application, DVD Architect.  I like it, I 
have made, what I consider some high quality DVD's with animated 
menu's, chapters, etc.  

Just more food for thought..  ;)

Heath
http://batmangeek.com
http://heathparks.com

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I ran Vegas 3 and 4 back in 2003-2005 then I got a mac.
 
 Hadn't thought about dual booting with XP...
 
 I'm going to be doing some DVD authoring, though, and don't know  
 whether or not I want to go back to Vegas.
 
 I mentioned this a while back, but...
 
 I'm looking at a 15 macbook pro (4GB) with FCP Studio.
 
 Not sure how I want to proceed.
 
 Vegas would be cheaper, but then I have to buy a seat of XP, and I  
 lose out on 3D and have less options on DVD authoring...
 
 Hmm...
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Ron Watson
 
 
 
 On May 9, 2008, at 10:19 AM, Heath wrote:
 
  I like Vegas so much that if I do get a Mac, I would still run 
Vegas
  via bootcamp or Parallels. I've been using Vegas for over 2 years
  now so if anyone has any questions about it, just let me know.
 
  Heath
  http://batmageek.com
  http://heathparks.com
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@ 
wrote:
  
   It's PC only, Ron - but Heath was suggesting using it on a Mac
  running
   Windows via Bootcamp or Parallels.
   Rupert
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Ron Watson k9disc@ 
wrote:
   
Heath, do you have a link for Vegas on Mac?
I'm googling with no luck...
I'll keep trying...
   
Cheers,
   
Ron Watson
   
   
   
On May 9, 2008, at 8:59 AM, Heath wrote:
   
 Just to echo Rupert's comments, I use Sony Vegas and while I
  have not
 worked in HD yet, I have been paying attention to AVCHD, 
since
 Panasonic uses that as well. From what I know by checking on
  fourms,
 etc Vegas does a really good job at handling AVCHD natively.
 Depending on some factors you can get Sony Vegas Movie 
Studio
  for
 about 100 bucks and that will edit HD footage, and you can 
run
  Vegas
 on a Mac with bootcamp I think, maybe something to think
  about...

 Heath
 http://batmangeek.com
 http://heathparks.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe rupert@
  wrote:
 
  The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
  Not quite true. The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but
  with
  limitations. The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for
  instance
  supports it, but not the better iMovie 6. If you have an 
older
  version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck. But then if you 
have
  an
 older
  Mac, you're stuck, too. Quick google told me that FCP 6 
(the
  latest
  version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and then was
  updated
  last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only 
on a
  Mac
 Pro
  and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 
10
  times
 more
  space than native AVCHD.
 
  For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas 
a
  lot.
 
  Rupert
  http://twittervlog.tv
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
  ottorabbit@ wrote:
  
   Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
  
  http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-
electronics/shop/Cameras-
 Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-
 HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
  Check
   respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
  
 



   
   
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-09 Thread Renat Zarbailov
Editing AVCHD on PC natively is now possible without any issues in
Adobe Premiere CS3 with an add on from Mainconcept called MainConcept
MPEG Pro HDV 3.1.0.
You would of course need a fast Intel Core Duo 2 machine with at least
2.6GHZ processor and 4GB RAM plus RAID0 hard drive configuration.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 The Apple Apps all have means to ingest AVCHD footage.
 
 Not quite true.  The *newest* Apple apps support AVCHD, but with
 limitations.  The terrible (in my view) new iMovie 08, for instance
 supports it, but not the better iMovie 6.  If you have an older
 version of iMovie or FCP, you're stuck.  But then if you have an older
 Mac, you're stuck, too.  Quick google told me that FCP 6 (the latest
 version) initially didn't allow AVCHD import, and  then was updated
 last summer to allow it, but with big limitations - only on a Mac Pro
 and not natively: it transcodes to other codecs that use 10 times more
 space than native AVCHD.
 
 For PCs, Sony Vegas does support AVCHD - and I like Vegas a lot.
 
 Rupert
 http://twittervlog.tv 
 
 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Christopher Polack
 ottorabbit@ wrote:
 
  Panasonic also has a hybrid camera -
 

http://www2.panasonic.com/consumer-electronics/shop/Cameras-Camcorders/Camcorders/Hi-Def-Camcorders/model.HDC-HS9_11002_7005702
  
  
 
  Check  
  respective NLE software sites for AVCHD workflow info.
 





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread ruperthowe
Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon HG10
last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from it.
 I don't really know what AVCHD means technically, nor do I really
care, but it seems only some apps will handle it.  There's an SD card,
but I think for photos only, not for video (I could be wrong) - and
I'm pretty sure it'll shoot SD DV as well as full HD.  Is niiiccee.
Rupert

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Richard Amirault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 - Original Message - 
 From: Adam Quirk 
  I'm looking for a camera that can record in both HD and SD
formats, and
  records to a solid-state media like flash or HDD.  Does anyone know of
  something like this?  I know of plenty of examples of either, but
none of
  both.
 
 Hmmm.  hard drives are *not* solid-state.
 
 Richard Amirault
 Boston, MA, USA
 http://n1jdu.org
 http://bostonfandom.org
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread J. N. Pereira
Hi,


I am still using a miniDV HDV camera (sony hc1e), but the more recent  
cameras either use HDD (internal hard disk) or memory cards (P2, SD  
(very fast cards only), SxS, memory stick pro (from sony)).

I think there is none that can tape simultaneously for HDD+SD or miniDV 
+SD, and on that Canon HG10 or Sony SR11 i think you have to opt for  
solid state or disk, you cannot do the two at the same time.

The main differences between so many models is normally the top stream  
rate that they can do in terms of AVHCD (MPEG2 stream on files),  
quality of the lenses and flexibility of recording modes.

I think there is a big shift in the camera models and especially on  
the recording part of the camcorders and so you have to choose what is  
best for what you want to do, and also don't forget to think if you  
are going to use it with another camera and so if the two pictures  
will merge ok in the timeline.

As all these is always changing, you also have to check if your  
editing workflow is compatible with that specific camera you want.

hope i help you a little on your question and maybe Ruppert can add  
more on the compatibility on the editing of those HG10 pictures.

Rgds
ZN

note: I hope that the next video cameras will be much more like RED  
digital cinema camera and we start to use the more flexible raw  
codecs because that will be a big and good step forward.



On May 7, 2008, at 21:13 , ruperthowe wrote:

 Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon HG10
 last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
 instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from it.
 I don't really know what AVCHD means technically, nor do I really
 care, but it seems only some apps will handle it.  There's an SD card,
 but I think for photos only, not for video (I could be wrong) - and
 I'm pretty sure it'll shoot SD DV as well as full HD.  Is  
 niiiccee.
 Rupert



 - Original Message -
 From: Adam Quirk
 I'm looking for a camera that can record in both HD and SD formats,  
 and
 records to a solid-state media like flash or HDD.  Does anyone know  
 of
 something like this?  I know of plenty of examples of either, but
 none of both.





[videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread ruperthowe
Ze's the man.
One thing that's worth noting - you might know this already - is that
with the Canon HV20 you can shoot in HD but choose to output from the
camera in Standard Def DV.  Which is useful if you find yourself
having to cut on an older system that can't handle/capture/cut your HD
footage.
But, crucially, as I'm writing this I'm realising that I don't think
the HG10 has this facility.  Something to do with the AVCHD, no doubt.
So actually, this message is useless to you.  But might be useful to
someone else.  So I'll send it anyway. La di da.

--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. N. Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi,
 
 
 I am still using a miniDV HDV camera (sony hc1e), but the more recent  
 cameras either use HDD (internal hard disk) or memory cards (P2, SD  
 (very fast cards only), SxS, memory stick pro (from sony)).
 
 I think there is none that can tape simultaneously for HDD+SD or miniDV 
 +SD, and on that Canon HG10 or Sony SR11 i think you have to opt for  
 solid state or disk, you cannot do the two at the same time.
 
 The main differences between so many models is normally the top stream  
 rate that they can do in terms of AVHCD (MPEG2 stream on files),  
 quality of the lenses and flexibility of recording modes.
 
 I think there is a big shift in the camera models and especially on  
 the recording part of the camcorders and so you have to choose what is  
 best for what you want to do, and also don't forget to think if you  
 are going to use it with another camera and so if the two pictures  
 will merge ok in the timeline.
 
 As all these is always changing, you also have to check if your  
 editing workflow is compatible with that specific camera you want.
 
 hope i help you a little on your question and maybe Ruppert can add  
 more on the compatibility on the editing of those HG10 pictures.
 
 Rgds
 ZN
 
 note: I hope that the next video cameras will be much more like RED  
 digital cinema camera and we start to use the more flexible raw  
 codecs because that will be a big and good step forward.
 
 
 
 On May 7, 2008, at 21:13 , ruperthowe wrote:
 
  Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon HG10
  last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
  instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from it.
  I don't really know what AVCHD means technically, nor do I really
  care, but it seems only some apps will handle it.  There's an SD card,
  but I think for photos only, not for video (I could be wrong) - and
  I'm pretty sure it'll shoot SD DV as well as full HD.  Is  
  niiiccee.
  Rupert
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Adam Quirk
  I'm looking for a camera that can record in both HD and SD formats,  
  and
  records to a solid-state media like flash or HDD.  Does anyone know  
  of
  something like this?  I know of plenty of examples of either, but
  none of both.
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread Adam Quirk
Right, that's what my main concern is.  Having the ability to shoot either
in HD or SD.  The HV20 does this, as does the HV30.  Unfortunately neither
of those are available to record to an HDD or flash memory.

I was all excited about the new Vixia HF10 because it records to an internal
flash memory and shoots HD, but then I read that it is incapable of
switching over to SD resolution.

http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HF10-Camcorder-Review-34711/Format.htm

I really need both HD and SD options available, because the project I'm
working on is going to need to shoot SD for a while, but will probably move
to HD in the coming year or two and won't want to buy a whole bunch of new
cameras.  We'll be buying at least 4 of them this year.

--

*Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck  Salvage LLC /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m)
/ imbullemhead (aim)


On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:49 PM, ruperthowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ze's the man.
 One thing that's worth noting - you might know this already - is that
 with the Canon HV20 you can shoot in HD but choose to output from the
 camera in Standard Def DV.  Which is useful if you find yourself
 having to cut on an older system that can't handle/capture/cut your HD
 footage.
 But, crucially, as I'm writing this I'm realising that I don't think
 the HG10 has this facility.  Something to do with the AVCHD, no doubt.
 So actually, this message is useless to you.  But might be useful to
 someone else.  So I'll send it anyway. La di da.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. N. Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
 
  I am still using a miniDV HDV camera (sony hc1e), but the more recent
  cameras either use HDD (internal hard disk) or memory cards (P2, SD
  (very fast cards only), SxS, memory stick pro (from sony)).
 
  I think there is none that can tape simultaneously for HDD+SD or miniDV
  +SD, and on that Canon HG10 or Sony SR11 i think you have to opt for
  solid state or disk, you cannot do the two at the same time.
 
  The main differences between so many models is normally the top stream
  rate that they can do in terms of AVHCD (MPEG2 stream on files),
  quality of the lenses and flexibility of recording modes.
 
  I think there is a big shift in the camera models and especially on
  the recording part of the camcorders and so you have to choose what is
  best for what you want to do, and also don't forget to think if you
  are going to use it with another camera and so if the two pictures
  will merge ok in the timeline.
 
  As all these is always changing, you also have to check if your
  editing workflow is compatible with that specific camera you want.
 
  hope i help you a little on your question and maybe Ruppert can add
  more on the compatibility on the editing of those HG10 pictures.
 
  Rgds
  ZN
 
  note: I hope that the next video cameras will be much more like RED
  digital cinema camera and we start to use the more flexible raw
  codecs because that will be a big and good step forward.
 
 
 
  On May 7, 2008, at 21:13 , ruperthowe wrote:
 
   Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon HG10
   last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
   instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from it.
   I don't really know what AVCHD means technically, nor do I really
   care, but it seems only some apps will handle it.  There's an SD card,
   but I think for photos only, not for video (I could be wrong) - and
   I'm pretty sure it'll shoot SD DV as well as full HD.  Is
   niiiccee.
   Rupert
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Adam Quirk
   I'm looking for a camera that can record in both HD and SD formats,
   and
   records to a solid-state media like flash or HDD.  Does anyone know
   of
   something like this?  I know of plenty of examples of either, but
   none of both.
  
 



 

 Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread J. N. Pereira
yeah. sony sr11, seems to be more flexible in that regard, but i think  
its also more expensive than canon.

http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551storeId=10151langId=-1productId=8198552921665291500

Format(s) Supported : HD: MPEG4 AVC/H.264 SD: MPEG2

Recording and Playback Times : High Definition: FH = 7 hours 10 min.  
HQ = 14 hours and 40 min. SP = 17 hours and 50 min. LP = 22 hours and  
50 min. Standard Definition: HQ = 14 hours and 40 min. SP = 21 hours  
and 50 min. LP = 41 hours and 50 min. When using 8GB Memory Stick PRO  
Duo™ Media (sold separately): High Definition: FH = up to 55 min., HQ  
= up to 115 min. SP = up to 140 min., LP = up to 180 min. Standard  
Definition: HQ = up to 115 min., SP = up to 170 min., LP = up to 5  
hours 25 min.

(I am not endorsing it, as for my self i actually have been buying  
sony's, but i would not say no to a better canon either, i don't  
really know what will be my next camera)

As for HD to SD conversion if you have the time and cpu, i am sure it  
can be done and if done in a proper way can even end up with a very  
good (better then) SD true progressive picture.
But is one more step between recording and the timeline, instead of  
the real time firewire most HDV cameras do when you capture directly  
to SD.


Rgds,
ZN


On May 7, 2008, at 22:59 , Adam Quirk wrote:

 Right, that's what my main concern is.  Having the ability to shoot  
 either
 in HD or SD.  The HV20 does this, as does the HV30.  Unfortunately  
 neither
 of those are available to record to an HDD or flash memory.

 I was all excited about the new Vixia HF10 because it records to an  
 internal
 flash memory and shoots HD, but then I read that it is incapable of
 switching over to SD resolution.

 http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HF10-Camcorder-Review-34711/Format.htm

 I really need both HD and SD options available, because the project  
 I'm
 working on is going to need to shoot SD for a while, but will  
 probably move
 to HD in the coming year or two and won't want to buy a whole bunch  
 of new
 cameras.  We'll be buying at least 4 of them this year.

 --

 *Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck  Salvage LLC /
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m)
 / imbullemhead (aim)


 On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:49 PM, ruperthowe  
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Ze's the man.
 One thing that's worth noting - you might know this already - is that
 with the Canon HV20 you can shoot in HD but choose to output from the
 camera in Standard Def DV.  Which is useful if you find yourself
 having to cut on an older system that can't handle/capture/cut your  
 HD
 footage.
 But, crucially, as I'm writing this I'm realising that I don't think
 the HG10 has this facility.  Something to do with the AVCHD, no  
 doubt.
 So actually, this message is useless to you.  But might be useful to
 someone else.  So I'll send it anyway. La di da.

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. N. Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
 wrote:

 Hi,


 I am still using a miniDV HDV camera (sony hc1e), but the more  
 recent
 cameras either use HDD (internal hard disk) or memory cards (P2, SD
 (very fast cards only), SxS, memory stick pro (from sony)).

 I think there is none that can tape simultaneously for HDD+SD or  
 miniDV
 +SD, and on that Canon HG10 or Sony SR11 i think you have to opt for
 solid state or disk, you cannot do the two at the same time.

 The main differences between so many models is normally the top  
 stream
 rate that they can do in terms of AVHCD (MPEG2 stream on files),
 quality of the lenses and flexibility of recording modes.

 I think there is a big shift in the camera models and especially on
 the recording part of the camcorders and so you have to choose  
 what is
 best for what you want to do, and also don't forget to think if you
 are going to use it with another camera and so if the two pictures
 will merge ok in the timeline.

 As all these is always changing, you also have to check if your
 editing workflow is compatible with that specific camera you want.

 hope i help you a little on your question and maybe Ruppert can add
 more on the compatibility on the editing of those HG10 pictures.

 Rgds
 ZN

 note: I hope that the next video cameras will be much more like RED
 digital cinema camera and we start to use the more flexible raw
 codecs because that will be a big and good step forward.



 On May 7, 2008, at 21:13 , ruperthowe wrote:

 Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon  
 HG10
 last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
 instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from  
 it.
 I don't really know what AVCHD means technically, nor do I really
 care, but it seems only some apps will handle it.  There's an SD  
 card,
 but I think for photos only, not for video (I could be wrong) - and
 I'm pretty sure it'll shoot SD DV as well as full HD.  Is
 niiiccee.
 Rupert



 - 

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Solid-state camera recommendation

2008-05-07 Thread Adam Quirk
That looks like exactly what we need.  Thanks a lot!

--

*Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck  Salvage LLC /
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m)
/ imbullemhead (aim)


On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 5:49 PM, J. N. Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 yeah. sony sr11, seems to be more flexible in that regard, but i think
 its also more expensive than canon.


 http://www.sonystyle.com/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/ProductDisplay?catalogId=10551storeId=10151langId=-1productId=8198552921665291500

 Format(s) Supported : HD: MPEG4 AVC/H.264 SD: MPEG2

 Recording and Playback Times : High Definition: FH = 7 hours 10 min.
 HQ = 14 hours and 40 min. SP = 17 hours and 50 min. LP = 22 hours and
 50 min. Standard Definition: HQ = 14 hours and 40 min. SP = 21 hours
 and 50 min. LP = 41 hours and 50 min. When using 8GB Memory Stick PRO
 Duo™ Media (sold separately): High Definition: FH = up to 55 min., HQ
 = up to 115 min. SP = up to 140 min., LP = up to 180 min. Standard
 Definition: HQ = up to 115 min., SP = up to 170 min., LP = up to 5
 hours 25 min.

 (I am not endorsing it, as for my self i actually have been buying
 sony's, but i would not say no to a better canon either, i don't
 really know what will be my next camera)

 As for HD to SD conversion if you have the time and cpu, i am sure it
 can be done and if done in a proper way can even end up with a very
 good (better then) SD true progressive picture.
 But is one more step between recording and the timeline, instead of
 the real time firewire most HDV cameras do when you capture directly
 to SD.


 Rgds,
 ZN


 On May 7, 2008, at 22:59 , Adam Quirk wrote:

  Right, that's what my main concern is.  Having the ability to shoot
  either
  in HD or SD.  The HV20 does this, as does the HV30.  Unfortunately
  neither
  of those are available to record to an HDD or flash memory.
 
  I was all excited about the new Vixia HF10 because it records to an
  internal
  flash memory and shoots HD, but then I read that it is incapable of
  switching over to SD resolution.
 
 
 http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content/Canon-Vixia-HF10-Camcorder-Review-34711/Format.htm
 
  I really need both HD and SD options available, because the project
  I'm
  working on is going to need to shoot SD for a while, but will
  probably move
  to HD in the coming year or two and won't want to buy a whole bunch
  of new
  cameras.  We'll be buying at least 4 of them this year.
 
  --
 
  *Adam Quirk* / Producer, Wreck  Salvage LLC /
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] /+1 551.208.4644 (m)
  / imbullemhead (aim)
 
 
  On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 4:49 PM, ruperthowe
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Ze's the man.
  One thing that's worth noting - you might know this already - is that
  with the Canon HV20 you can shoot in HD but choose to output from the
  camera in Standard Def DV.  Which is useful if you find yourself
  having to cut on an older system that can't handle/capture/cut your
  HD
  footage.
  But, crucially, as I'm writing this I'm realising that I don't think
  the HG10 has this facility.  Something to do with the AVCHD, no
  doubt.
  So actually, this message is useless to you.  But might be useful to
  someone else.  So I'll send it anyway. La di da.
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, J. N. Pereira [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  wrote:
 
  Hi,
 
 
  I am still using a miniDV HDV camera (sony hc1e), but the more
  recent
  cameras either use HDD (internal hard disk) or memory cards (P2, SD
  (very fast cards only), SxS, memory stick pro (from sony)).
 
  I think there is none that can tape simultaneously for HDD+SD or
  miniDV
  +SD, and on that Canon HG10 or Sony SR11 i think you have to opt for
  solid state or disk, you cannot do the two at the same time.
 
  The main differences between so many models is normally the top
  stream
  rate that they can do in terms of AVHCD (MPEG2 stream on files),
  quality of the lenses and flexibility of recording modes.
 
  I think there is a big shift in the camera models and especially on
  the recording part of the camcorders and so you have to choose
  what is
  best for what you want to do, and also don't forget to think if you
  are going to use it with another camera and so if the two pictures
  will merge ok in the timeline.
 
  As all these is always changing, you also have to check if your
  editing workflow is compatible with that specific camera you want.
 
  hope i help you a little on your question and maybe Ruppert can add
  more on the compatibility on the editing of those HG10 pictures.
 
  Rgds
  ZN
 
  note: I hope that the next video cameras will be much more like RED
  digital cinema camera and we start to use the more flexible raw
  codecs because that will be a big and good step forward.
 
 
 
  On May 7, 2008, at 21:13 , ruperthowe wrote:
 
  Canon blogger relations gave me the chance to play with a Canon
  HG10
  last month.  It's almost identical to the HV20, but records to HDD
  instead of tape.  You need a program that will capture AVCHD from
  it.
  I don't