*Au contraire*, dear Frank, media makers rely on base human nature to
produce content guaranteed to suck audiences in.
If it bleeds, it leads mentality. Everywhere.
Big media relies a great deal on tits, ass, sexual frustration, and various
forms of perversion (torture wrapped in pretty ribbons
Watching. Brilliantly on point.
More later.
XO,
Jan
On Dec 28, 2007 10:17 AM, Markus Sandy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:46 PM, Frank Sinton wrote:
One big reason big media rings so false: advertisers control
content.
I have to disagree with that. Viewers control
On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:46 PM, Frank Sinton wrote:
One big reason big media rings so false: advertisers control
content.
I have to disagree with that. Viewers control the content. Meaning,
studios only fund productions they think audiences will watch, buy a
movie ticket, purchase a DVD,
Ads are less effective these for lots of reasons I'll not get into
here. The
result is television has resorted to Big Messages in their
programming. It's
those 'messages' I noticed as I spent the last six months viewing
all the
networks' top shows online or on DVD. The messages are
Spot on indeed...
My very first Recommended diary at Daily Kos back in '04.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2004/12/12/44450/883
While many people are under the impression that the customers of
the media are the end users (viewers, readers, and listeners) that
impression is incorrect. The
Why advertising is a dangerous way to go if you're interested in true
things.
Somehow I've managed to sleep well at night getting paid by advertisers for
6 years. Then again, I'm largely trying to help people be less frustrated
with their computers, not change the world.
One big reason big
Yup. If anything the group's vitality temperature shot out of the
thermometer during the past week or so.
Unless you measure a group's health primarily by a LACK of diversity
and conflict.
___
Brook Hinton
film/video/audio art
Ease up, lads.
Keep it on point.
Jan
On Dec 28, 2007 2:44 PM, Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Then I suggest you look in the mirror then, cause you have done your
fair share of nit picking.
heath
http://batmangeek.com
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Delongchamp
[EMAIL
i don't personally believe this nor do i think anyone could conjure up any
form of proof to back this up.
they are/were just a business entity trying to ride the wave of net
video like so many others.
they held this yahoo group up to exaggerative heights, or maybe that was
just scoble... but
At this point, I'd like to thank Brooke and Steve for responding to my comments.
Steve, I hope you can appreciate the comments I made about how when
people begin to agree, they stop contributing. If your posts feel
ignored as you've often stated, please take into consideration. Even
when you
I didn't respond because I found your tone to be dismissive and I
found your argument to be extremely weak and didn't really think it
merited a reply. Not trying to egg you on, just trying to be honest.
I've written far too much on this topic here, once again...
But come on...
Writers
Hint: eventually sponsors and employees get the message and move
money away from a company that isn't getting community support. And,
worse,
it definitely demoralizes the employees and makes them far less willing
to take risks on behalf of the community.
I think this is BS too.
If you
Why advertising is a dangerous way to go if you're interested in true
things.
One big reason big media rings so false: advertisers control content.
Jan
On Dec 27, 2007 10:37 PM, Jake Ludington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hint: eventually sponsors and employees get the message and move
money
On Dec 26, 2007 4:31 PM, Kent Nichols [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But things started bogging down when they were focused more on
developing a new flash player in house rather than selling sponsorships.
I agree with this. That's one thing I could never understand. Why did
PodTech feel the need to
I agree with this. That's one thing I could never understand. Why did
PodTech feel the need to hire an engineering team to reinvent the wheel?
That was a decision I had no impact on (there was an engineering team hired
before I got there). As you know, I interviewed the Castfire guys and tried
to
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [videoblogging] Re: My Amends To Robert Scoble
And the great Scoble proves my point, narry a word from the manoh
well
Heath
http://batmangeek. http://batmangeek.com com
--- In videoblogging@ mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com
: [videoblogging] Re: My Amends To Robert Scoble
And the great Scoble proves my point, narry a word from the
manoh
well
Heath
http://batmangeek. http://batmangeek.com com
--- In videoblogging@ mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
yahoogroups.com, Heath heathparks@ wrote
17 matches
Mail list logo
