RE: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-20 Thread Gary Short
 

 

From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Irina
Sent: 19 December 2006 22:47
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

 

what's a boobie?

Oh Irina, you so know what that is ;)

Cheers,
Gary
http://www.garyshort.org/
http://www.carnoustiegolflinks.co.uk/vlog/





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread CarLBanks
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out. Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!

-- 
http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making political
 statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out. Political
 statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to do with
 politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!

Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do you honestly think  
that they were made for shits and giggles?

- Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
-- 
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 


Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread CarLBanks
Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If Kerry made a
Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.

On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 :

  It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making political
  statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out. Political
  statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to do with
  politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!

 Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do you honestly think

 that they were made for shits and giggles?

 - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
 --
 Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
 URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  




-- 
http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
I'd rather be turning people on to watching Alive In Baghdad than discuss
this nonsense. There are far more important matters at hand.



On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   We have a president that many people feel stole his first term in
 office and won his second term because of fear mongering and the
 natural incumbency strength of a wartime administration. We have a
 president who many feel has lied to the country, waged an illegitimate
 and possibly illegal war and has severely diminished the reputation of
 America abroad. Bush's administration has overseen the largest
 expansion of the government and consequently deficit spending in
 history. Many of us feel that he is ruinous to this country's health.
 Statistically, every class but the rich are economically worse off
 after 6 years of his administration which consistently tries to cut
 funding for the arts and public media. And, still, you seem to think
 that in such an atmosphere that the Whitehouse spending time and money
 to produce a cute video about a dog won't or shouldn't garner
 crititcism. This makes no sense to me. Prima Facie everything an
 unpopular and embattled leader does will invite analysis and
 criticism. Why are you shaming people for having their opinions? Is
 it possible that you are a supporter of Bush's bankrupt policies? If
 that's not the case, if you're not a right-winger, what are you doing
 shaming people for having their political opinions? Shaming and
 silencing opposition is a tactic of the right-wing and has no place in
 open public discourse. Think Joseph McCarthy and the blacklists.
 Sorry Carl, I'm just not going for it. I've been a member of this
 board for awhile. I don't post too regularly, but I won't be shamed by
 you or anyone else into silence. Bush is a destructive fool. That ANY
 money and effort was spent to produce a cute video about a dog at a
 time when we are bleeding money for a war that appears to be a personal
 family vendetta is outrageous and needs to be commented on with
 political criticism.

 -David

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making political
  statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out. Political
  statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to do with
  politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread CarLBanks
Your right David, I support Bush and his corrupt policies. He may not be
our best president, but he's better than the alternatives we had! I thought
this whole topic was about the fact that they have a cute video about their
dogs. Not a forum to discuss politics. I'm not saying you don't have a right
to your opinion. I'm saying this isn't the right topic for it!

On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   We have a president that many people feel stole his first term in
 office and won his second term because of fear mongering and the
 natural incumbency strength of a wartime administration. We have a
 president who many feel has lied to the country, waged an illegitimate
 and possibly illegal war and has severely diminished the reputation of
 America abroad. Bush's administration has overseen the largest
 expansion of the government and consequently deficit spending in
 history. Many of us feel that he is ruinous to this country's health.
 Statistically, every class but the rich are economically worse off
 after 6 years of his administration which consistently tries to cut
 funding for the arts and public media. And, still, you seem to think
 that in such an atmosphere that the Whitehouse spending time and money
 to produce a cute video about a dog won't or shouldn't garner
 crititcism. This makes no sense to me. Prima Facie everything an
 unpopular and embattled leader does will invite analysis and
 criticism. Why are you shaming people for having their opinions? Is
 it possible that you are a supporter of Bush's bankrupt policies? If
 that's not the case, if you're not a right-winger, what are you doing
 shaming people for having their political opinions? Shaming and
 silencing opposition is a tactic of the right-wing and has no place in
 open public discourse. Think Joseph McCarthy and the blacklists.
 Sorry Carl, I'm just not going for it. I've been a member of this
 board for awhile. I don't post too regularly, but I won't be shamed by
 you or anyone else into silence. Bush is a destructive fool. That ANY
 money and effort was spent to produce a cute video about a dog at a
 time when we are bleeding money for a war that appears to be a personal
 family vendetta is outrageous and needs to be commented on with
 political criticism.

 -David


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making political
  statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out. Political
  statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to do with
  politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  




-- 
http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Markus Sandy
hey carl

please check out this vlog post by michael verdi

http://michaelverdi.com/index.php/2005/09/16/hail-to-the-thief/

i think it relates

markus


On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:48 AM, CarLBanks wrote:

 Your right David, I support Bush and his corrupt policies. He may 
 not be
  our best president, but he's better than the alternatives we had! I 
 thought
  this whole topic was about the fact that they have a cute video about 
 their
  dogs. Not a forum to discuss politics. I'm not saying you don't have 
 a right
  to your opinion. I'm saying this isn't the right topic for it!



---
Markus Sandy
http://feeds.feedburner.com/havemoneywillvlog
http://feeds.feedburner.com/apperceptions
http://feeds.feedburner.com/digitaldojo
http://feeds.feedburner.com/spinflow


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Irina
now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
from my paycheck to  pay for the war.

On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Carl,

 I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos are PR,
 and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But it's more
 than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
 criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such crap to
 soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq that he
 started with no good or legal cause, and under false pretenses that
 is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings. The man
 belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with all the
 other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the facts no
 matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the radio
 tells you.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If Kerry
 made a
  Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
 
  On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
   :
  
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making
 political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out.
 Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to
 do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
  
   Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do you
 honestly think
  
   that they were made for shits and giggles?
  
   - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
   --
   Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
   URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Irina
hey robyn and carl = you just made sure that the convo
was not one sided by including your voices!
but hoping not to hear politics is like hoping for it not to rain.

On 12/19/06, Robyn Tippins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I am actually in agreement that I also hope not to hear politics (or
 really
 one-sided politics) on the list. Of course, I'm going nowhere, I'll just
 delete those messages, but just to let you know, Carl is not alone...

 Robyn

 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com[mailto:
 videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Bill Streeter
 Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 1:07 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

 Carl,

 I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos are PR,
 and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But it's more
 than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
 criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such crap to
 soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq that he
 started with no good or legal cause, and under false pretenses that
 is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings. The man
 belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with all the
 other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the facts no
 matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the radio
 tells you.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com , CarLBanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
 
  Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If Kerry
 made a
  Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
 
  On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
   [EMAIL PROTECTED]carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
   :
  
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from making
 political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts out.
 Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had nothing to
 do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
  
   Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do you
 honestly think
  
   that they were made for shits and giggles?
  
   - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
   --
   Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
   URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Irina
what's a boobie?

On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   What is a videoblog?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  can we just drop this and talk about boobies again? Please.no
  one is going to change their minds on how they feel.how bout we
  talk about something that will not spark such strong
 feelinglike
  religion..
 
  ;)
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 David david@ wrote:
  
   That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can
   imagine and probably more than anyone on this board has spent in
 a
   year on his own work. And to make matters worse, it was hoakey.
  The
   awe-shucks sensibility that pervades it is so tiresome and
   hackneyed. Do you think that Bush read his lines for it moments
   before or after he committed to actions that would lead to
  thousands
   of more people being killed? There's something pathologically
   disconnected about its aesthetic. We see, yet again, Bush
 sitting
   among the children. Maybe he's trying to tell us somethnig.
 Maybe
   he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie
  table.
  
   -David
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Irina irinaski@ wrote:
   
now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
from my paycheck to pay for the war.
   
On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote:

 Carl,

 I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos
  are
   PR,
 and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But
 it's
   more
 than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
 criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such
 crap
  to
 soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq
 that
  he
 started with no good or legal cause, and under false
 pretenses
   that
 is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings.
 The
   man
 belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with
  all
   the
 other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the
  facts
   no
 matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the
  radio
 tells you.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com

 --- In 
 videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%
   40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks carlbanks@
 wrote:
 
  Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If
  Kerry
 made a
  Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
 
  On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen solitude@ wrote:
  
   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
   carlbanks@carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
   :
  
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from
 making
 political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts
 out.
 Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had
  nothing
   to
 do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
  
   Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do
 you
 honestly think
  
   that they were made for shits and giggles?
  
   - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
   --
   Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
   URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 



   
   
   
--
http://geekentertainment.tv
   
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   
  
 

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread sull
A videoblog is something that can be discussed here in depth.

Unlike Political Issues.

That's why we all have blogs.

;)

On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   What is a videoblog?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  can we just drop this and talk about boobies again? Please.no
  one is going to change their minds on how they feel.how bout we
  talk about something that will not spark such strong
 feelinglike
  religion..
 
  ;)
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 David david@ wrote:
  
   That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can
   imagine and probably more than anyone on this board has spent in
 a
   year on his own work. And to make matters worse, it was hoakey.
  The
   awe-shucks sensibility that pervades it is so tiresome and
   hackneyed. Do you think that Bush read his lines for it moments
   before or after he committed to actions that would lead to
  thousands
   of more people being killed? There's something pathologically
   disconnected about its aesthetic. We see, yet again, Bush
 sitting
   among the children. Maybe he's trying to tell us somethnig.
 Maybe
   he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie
  table.
  
   -David
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Irina irinaski@ wrote:
   
now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
from my paycheck to pay for the war.
   
On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote:

 Carl,

 I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos
  are
   PR,
 and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But
 it's
   more
 than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
 criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such
 crap
  to
 soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq
 that
  he
 started with no good or legal cause, and under false
 pretenses
   that
 is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings.
 The
   man
 belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with
  all
   the
 other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the
  facts
   no
 matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the
  radio
 tells you.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com

 --- In 
 videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%
   40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks carlbanks@
 wrote:
 
  Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If
  Kerry
 made a
  Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
 
  On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen solitude@ wrote:
  
   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
   carlbanks@carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
   :
  
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from
 making
 political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts
 out.
 Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had
  nothing
   to
 do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
  
   Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do
 you
 honestly think
  
   that they were made for shits and giggles?
  
   - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
   --
   Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
   URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 



   
   
   
--
http://geekentertainment.tv
   
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   
  
 

  




-- 
Sull
http://vlogdir.com (a project)
http://SpreadTheMedia.org (my blog)
http://interdigitate.com (otherly)


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



RE: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Robyn Tippins
I think we can all agree on boobies.

 

robyn

 

From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Irina
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 PM
To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

 

what's a boobie?

On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:david%40captainhumphreys.com  wrote:

 What is a videoblog?


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  can we just drop this and talk about boobies again? Please.no
  one is going to change their minds on how they feel.how bout we
  talk about something that will not spark such strong
 feelinglike
  religion..
 
  ;)
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 David david@ wrote:
  
   That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can
   imagine and probably more than anyone on this board has spent in
 a
   year on his own work. And to make matters worse, it was hoakey.
  The
   awe-shucks sensibility that pervades it is so tiresome and
   hackneyed. Do you think that Bush read his lines for it moments
   before or after he committed to actions that would lead to
  thousands
   of more people being killed? There's something pathologically
   disconnected about its aesthetic. We see, yet again, Bush
 sitting
   among the children. Maybe he's trying to tell us somethnig.
 Maybe
   he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie
  table.
  
   -David
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Irina irinaski@ wrote:
   
now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
from my paycheck to pay for the war.
   
On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote:

 Carl,

 I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos
  are
   PR,
 and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But
 it's
   more
 than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
 criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such
 crap
  to
 soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq
 that
  he
 started with no good or legal cause, and under false
 pretenses
   that
 is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings.
 The
   man
 belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with
  all
   the
 other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the
  facts
   no
 matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the
  radio
 tells you.

 Bill Streeter
 LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
 www.lofistl.com

 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com
mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%
   40yahoogroups.com,
 CarLBanks carlbanks@
 wrote:
 
  Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If
  Kerry
 made a
  Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
 
  On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen solitude@ wrote:
  
   Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
   carlbanks@carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
   :
  
It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from
 making
 political
statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts
 out.
 Political
statements had no place in this movie since it had
  nothing
   to
 do with
politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
  
   Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do
 you
 honestly think
  
   that they were made for shits and giggles?
  
   - Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
   --
   Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
   URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
  
  
 
 
 
  --
  http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
 
 
  [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 



   
   
   
--
http://geekentertainment.tv
   
   
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
   
  
 

 


-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Jeffrey Taylor
After a few drinks, even this queen can agree on boobies.

On 12/20/06, Robyn Tippins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I think we can all agree on boobies.

 robyn

 From: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com[mailto:
 videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Irina
 Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 5:47 PM
 To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and
 Podcasting)

 what's a boobie?

 On 12/19/06, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]david%40captainhumphreys.com
 mailto:david% david%2540captainhumphreys.com  wrote:
 
  What is a videoblog?
 
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  Heath [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   can we just drop this and talk about boobies again? Please.no
   one is going to change their minds on how they feel.how bout we
   talk about something that will not spark such strong
  feelinglike
   religion..
  
   ;)
  
   --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
  David david@ wrote:
   
That video (that series of videos) probably cost more than we can
imagine and probably more than anyone on this board has spent in
  a
year on his own work. And to make matters worse, it was hoakey.
   The
awe-shucks sensibility that pervades it is so tiresome and
hackneyed. Do you think that Bush read his lines for it moments
before or after he committed to actions that would lead to
   thousands
of more people being killed? There's something pathologically
disconnected about its aesthetic. We see, yet again, Bush
  sitting
among the children. Maybe he's trying to tell us somethnig.
  Maybe
he knows what some of us won't admit: he belongs at the kiddie
   table.
   
-David
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,

  Irina irinaski@ wrote:

 now i'm sorry i even watched that PR video. bill,
 i'm sure it was made with the 40% that's taken
 from my paycheck to pay for the war.

 On 12/19/06, Bill Streeter bill@ wrote:
 
  Carl,
 
  I think you're being a little naive about this. These videos
   are
PR,
  and yes every president engages in this sort of thing. But
  it's
more
  than a little off putting to a lot of people to see someone as
  criminally incompetent and as corrupt as Bush put out such
  crap
   to
  soften his image. Meanwhile there is a war raging in Iraq
  that
   he
  started with no good or legal cause, and under false
  pretenses
that
  is responsible for the deaths of thousands of human beings.
  The
man
  belongs behind bars where he can do no more harm a long with
   all
the
  other neo-con jobs in his administration. And those are the
   facts
no
  matter what whacky drug addled conservative jack-off on the
   radio
  tells you.
 
  Bill Streeter
  LO-FI SAINT LOUIS
  www.lofistl.com
 
  --- In 
  videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 mailto:videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
 videoblogging%40yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%
40yahoogroups.com,
  CarLBanks carlbanks@
  wrote:
  
   Yes, they were made as fun videos to entertain people. If
   Kerry
  made a
   Christmas video everyone would say Oh, how cute!.
  
   On 12/19/06, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen solitude@ wrote:
   
Den 19.12.2006 kl. 16:04 skrev CarLBanks
carlbanks@carlbanks%40thenameiwantedwastaken.com
:
   
 It is truly quite sad that we couldn't refrain from
  making
  political
 statements over a cute video that the Whitehouse puts
  out.
  Political
 statements had no place in this movie since it had
   nothing
to
  do with
 politics. Thanks for being so on topic everyone!
   
Those videos are as political as any campaign video. Do
  you
  honestly think
   
that they were made for shits and giggles?
   
- Andreas, who prefers cat videos anyway
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/ 
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   http://thenameiwantedwastaken.com
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 
 
 



 --
 http://geekentertainment.tv


 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

   
  
 
 
 

 --
 http://geekentertainment.tv

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

  



[Non-text portions

Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-19 Thread Irina
it's my boobs in a box!
video coming soon

On 12/19/06, Jarod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 Somewhere in D.C. a little dog is crying - realizing he is nothing but
 another tool that the government is using for their own agenda. We
 ruined the little guys '06 Christmas. To think that some of us thought
 he was just cute.

 Hope you're all proud ;o)

 Jarod
 (Don't Drink and Post, nothing good ever comes of it)


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Aldon Hynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Trying to step aside from the most basic reactions of whether or not
 people
  support Bush, I think there are a several interesting things to look at.
 
  Politicians who are in office have an advantage of using the office to
  produce media to get their message out. Often it is in terms of those
  direct mail pieces reviewing ones accomplishments that always seem
 to come
  out shortly before election season. There is a valid concern about
 any and
  all politicians using the power of their offices to get their
 messages out.
  It is part of what keeps incumbents in office. This is one of the
 common
  arguements for public financing of campaigns. We are already publicly
  financing part of campaigns.
 
  While the aethetic of the Barney video is not appealing to me, I
 suspect it
  is very appealing to many. It is useful to be aware of those
 audiences that
  have different aesthetic sensibilities and thinking about how (and
 if) one
  wishes to reach them.
 
  Yes, I hope that we see the use of online videos to present a more
 authentic
  and less 'mediated' experience of our political leaders. As such, I
 have a
  strong dislike of the video, not because of the subject, but because
 of it
  promoting an idea of highly produced, highly mediated videos
 
  My two cents.
 
  Aldon
 

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



Re: [videoblogging] Re: The Whitehouse is Vlogging (and Podcasting)

2006-12-18 Thread Irina
i feel like jarod, i hate bush and everything he does, but that damn littlle
short was good
i still hate bush, i bet the guy they hired to make that short hates him too
:)

On 12/18/06, Casey McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Kinda makes me feel like part of the Bush family... oh wait, I am!
 Hehehe...

 We put out our Christmas episode today, sorry to say though that Miss
 Beazley does not make an appearance :P

 Casey

 ---
 http://www.galacticast.com/


 --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Jarod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
 Jan / The Faux Press
  jannie.jan@ wrote:
  
  I really wanted to think of some smart comment that would back my
  opinion of my appointed president... but gosh darn it - that was
  pretty cute.
 
  Jarod.
 
   Yes, based on the dates, but don't know when they got RSS.
  
   Hard to say...Who knows how to figure that out? Is there a way?
  
   J
  
   On 12/18/06, David Howell taoofdavid@ wrote:
   
Hasnt the BarneyCam been going for something like 2 or 3 years
  now?
   
David
http://www.davidhowellstudios.com
   
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.comvideoblogging%40yahoogroups.com
  videoblogging%40yahoogroups.com,
Jan / The Faux Press
   
jannie.jan@ wrote:

 I love this.

 Whereas a few minutes ago I was not in the holiday spirit, I
 am now,
 thanks to BarneyCam, the first dog's videoblog.

 Here's Barney's 2006 Holiday video:
 http://www.whitehouse.gov/barney/vodcast/barneycam2005.mp4

 Here's the page with all the feeds: http://www.whitehouse.gov/rss/

 The Whitehouse is podcasting and videoblogging

 Aaah.

 Cool.

 Vlogging's arrived.

 Peace.

 Jan

 --
 The Faux Press - better than real
 http://fauxpress.blogspot.com

   
   
   
  
  
  
   --
   The Faux Press - better than real
   http://fauxpress.blogspot.com
  
  
   [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
  
 

  




-- 
http://geekentertainment.tv


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]