Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Josh Leo wrote: > > the "video podcasting group" has 2 members, and Taylor is one of them/the > creator. It doesn't seem like a "community" site in the least... > > I would like to throw wearethemedia.com but i am > having aprehensions about it because it is something i

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

is there a specific reason why your site should be presented instead of other peoples content? or is it just a desire to get exposure for your creation (like the other hundreds of vloggers)?On 10/18/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:  especially since I know that some of youdon't show my site

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

my only beef with the document is the added "community" groups... the videoblogigng google group is just a copy of all the emails form the yahoo group, so not really anything that people use unless they want to search for something (the search works better) the "video podcasting group" has 2 m

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Do you guys remember that Channel Zero thing?  Advertisers bought TVs for schools, but the kids had to watch a couple of minutes of ads before their "educational" TV.  Couldn't pull that on kids these days - they'd mash it up...bOn 18-Oct-05, at 9:37 AM, Pete Prodoehl wrote: Markus Sandy wrote:

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Thank you. I really put a lot of work into the new version. And I really need the exposure - especially since I know that some of you don't show my site in your presentations. -- Taylor Barcroft http://www.blogger.com/profile/11159903 New Media Publisher, Editor, Video Journalist, Podcaster, F

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

I apologize Taylor. I did not mean to slight you by implying your edits were "small". I was referring to every possible edit that might be made in the future. I did not see the hype statement about archive.org in the original and so I mistakenly "credited" the addition to you. Again, I apo

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Markus Sandy wrote: > > maybe i'm behind the times > are they putting coke ads in textbooks these days if they donate time or > money to schools? > if so, is that a good thing? Heh, I remember back when I worked at a design firm, and we did book covers for Coke/Pepsi that would be given out to

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

this is productive.On 10/18/05, Kunga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: There was nothing "small" about the edit, additions and pdf creationwork I did on that document. It took me at least 6 hours to do thatwork. My site is totally related to Vlogging. I need the exposure. That is why I did the wor

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

There was nothing "small" about the edit, additions and pdf creation work I did on that document. It took me at least 6 hours to do that work. My site is totally related to Vlogging. I need the exposure. That is why I did the work. So I could get credit for it. Now that others have bravely c

Re: [videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Randolfe Wicker wrote: Markus took exception to the PDF file that Ryanne Hodson and Taylor Barcroft had created entitled "Videoblogging Resources" to which they ended with "Compiled by Ryanne Hodson" and "Edited, Appended &PDF created by Taylor Barcroft" you're totally off base r

[videoblogging] Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

Markus took exception to the PDF file that Ryanne Hodson and Taylor Barcroft had created entitled "Videoblogging Resources" to which they ended with "Compiled by Ryanne Hodson" and "Edited, Appended &PDF created by Taylor Barcroft"   This is a fine list of resources.  When someone essentia