Just checking back in on this thread and finding that its subject has
predictably veered away from content into technical realms.
So, to get back on topic...
http://www.bullemhead.com/Government/poor_bunny.html
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "videoblogging" on th
Still that is a huge honking file - even for upper end DSL/Cable
users. Is she or her company presenting content that is worthy of that
file size?
I don't object to people wanting to present their stuff in the best
resolution and format. But that size excludes the very people the
democracy is
Oops, should was supposed to be shouldnt.
lol it serves me right, the democracy now video is getting on my
nerves by taking ages to download. Another drawback to long video
length & filesize is of course that it compounds any server speed &
bandwidth cost issues. With my current connection a 1
Its all relative. 147MB for an hours video is really small to me, its
very impressive really when we consider that less than a decade ago an
hours worth of music was at least 500MB.
Yes you could get the file down to 50MB, or make extreme reductions
such as the video being at 1 frame per secon