Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-04 Thread Jan
gt; To: Sent: Thursday, August 04, 2005 7:07 PM Subject: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent > How about using the Rhizone thingy? > > You can have me dancing around, pointing to my left-- where you will see a > big jar of > mayo being slurped down by a little kitty cat

Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-04 Thread Michael Sullivan
OTECTED]>>Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com>Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent>Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:24:23 -0400> >That post says this:>>What would you pay to place an ad on a videoblog?>>More Pe

[videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-04 Thread johngaltsjournal
ter the viewer has gotten what he/she wanted. > > I am asssuming the rates you quote are for successfully completed commercial > streams and not based on the number of people only watching the content. > > -David > > > > >From: Steve Garfield <[EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-04 Thread David Yirchott
ield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >To: videoblogging@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent >Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 00:24:23 -0400 > >That post says this: > >What would you pay to place an ad on a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-04 Thread Andreas Haugstrup
On Thu, 04 Aug 2005 06:17:54 +0200, jadly6 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Rob check your link... To avoid links breaking in e-mails you enclose them between So this url: >> http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2005/08/what-would-you-pay-to-place- >> ad-on.html would be written: http://offona

Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-03 Thread Steve Garfield
That post says this: What would you pay to place an ad on a videoblog? More People Turn to the Web to Watch TV - New York Times: "An Internet commercial typically costs about $15 to $20 for each 1,000 viewers, nearly as much as broadcast networks charge. The price is high because there is

Re: [videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-03 Thread robert a/k/a r
it's late and my brain is slowing down, worse than usual - sorry. here's the yahoo-proof link: http://tinyurl.com/apnnh cheers -- http://r.24x7.com On Aug 4, 2005, at 12:17 AM, jadly6 wrote: Rob check your link... jad madpod.com dummycast.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert

[videoblogging] Re: off on a (valuation) tangent

2005-08-03 Thread jadly6
Rob check your link... jad madpod.com dummycast.com --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, robert a/k/a r <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all > > i've been thinking about this too. > > what's the right number, or perhaps better phrased what's the pricingĀ  > model? > > http://offonatangent.