Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2007-12-26 Thread Richard Amirault
- Original Message - 
From: Chris
(snip)
 Do you prefer personal or commercial video blogs?

   o Personal
   o Commercial
   o I Like Both
(snip)
 I guess what I'm saying is I don't understand the question.

And I'll ad that I don't think there are enough options for answers. (which 
is a common problem in these Yahoogroup polls) How about something like I 
don't care or neither?

Richard Amirault
Boston, MA, USA
http://n1jdu.org
http://bostonfandom.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7hf9u2ZdlQ 


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2007-12-26 Thread Brian Richardson - WhatTheCast?
On Wed, 26 Dec 2007 2:55 pm, Brook Hinton wrote:
 Yup, It's not this simple at all. Lots of folks have vlogs that don't
 fit either, contain elements of both, or are otherwise outside that
 spectrum.


I think that's a core problem in this and other new media groups ... 
the concept of professional is somehow skewed by how the content is 
delivered.

The NBC station in Atlanta sent their news anchors home with video 
cameras to tape how they spent their holiday. The videos are unpolished 
and look like many personal vlogs out on the Interweb's tubes. Are 
they not professional anymore? They're online, but hosted by an NBC 
affiliate. The camera work is not professional, but they're funded by a 
mainstream media outlet ... Very fuzzy line here.

Dragon*ConTV is non-commercial, but we try to be as professional as 
possible making the content. Do we cross into the evils of commercial 
media once we purchase a good camera, some wireless mics  3000W of 
3200K lighting?

I like entertaining videos, good videos, well-produced videos that still 
have some personality intact ... and I don't care if they come from 
YouTube or the CathodeRayTube :)
--
Brian Richardson
  - http://whatthecast.com
  - http://siliconchef.com
  - http://dragoncontv.com
  - http://www.3chip.com


Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2005-12-09 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Bill Streeter wrote:
 Yeah I would contribute to that. I know that there are some open 
 source editing suites that are coming along too that might be useful 
 to some people that should probably get talked about some more. I 
 can't think of names off hand but I have links to them at home that 
 I can post in the wiki or even here if someone wants me to. None of 
 which (that I've seen) are quite ready for prime time but look very 
 promising. I would love to support a great open source editing 
 software project.

Awesome... I've added links for many of the apps listed so it'll be 
easier for people to add reviews, and I also wrote up my review of Audacity:

  http://www.voxmedia.org/wiki/Videoblogging_Software


Make it a Wiki Friday folks... Go add something!


Pete

-- 
http://tinkernet.org/
videoblog for the future...




 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Most low income households are not online. Help bridge the digital divide today!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/I258zB/QnQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [videoblogging] Re: New poll for videoblogging

2005-12-08 Thread WWWhatsup

I disagree that it's meaningless - as you say, it would be
interesting to see what people are using.

I think it works fine as a survey of what people in the group use,
sophisticated or otherwise, given time to build a significant
response.

I've seen the question asked twice already, and I am sure it will
be again. It'll be nice to, rather than repeat this same back and forth,
give those inquirers an indication of the broad opinion of the group.

I'm certain there are a few more encoders that could be added. Suggestions?

joly

At 09:51 PM 12/8/2005, you wrote:
I agree the poll is meaningless. It also depends on what you're trying to 
achieve.  Do you 
want sohpisticated titling capabilities? Do you need use chroma keying?  Do 
you want real-
time rendering for transitions?  I too think FCP is by far the best choice 
from the different 
programs i've tried. But there also is a steep learning curve if you've never 
done any 
editing before.  

Plus it is difficult to say if one is better than another if you've never 
used the majority of 
them. 

I think it would be interesting to learn what people are currently using. Also 
some cameras 
allow you to edit on the actual camera although I imagine it would get tedious 
after awhile


Will  




---
 WWWhatsup NYC
http://pinstand.com - http://punkcast.com
--- 



 Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-- 
Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life.
http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/lBLqlB/TM
~- 

 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/videoblogging/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/