I was of course just re-iterating a point from the wonderful nyc.node101
anthology on blip.tv, because it was relevant to the discussion. Who is
the blue-haired English fellow who said it, by the way?
Regurgitation is something I haven't practiced since my exam-writing
days, although I hear it
not so, many people sign those rights away when entering into employment
for example, even if you have to buy your own uniform, there are often
rules as to how you can appear in it (e.g., no endorsements)
many employers (e.g., University of California) *require* the signing of
a "loyalty oath"
The scary thing is that a person can be intelligent, but people are
stupid. Ask anyone working in customer service. As much as I
wished people don't get worked up about parodies, someone
inevitably will step on toes. I think the world would be a lot nicer if
more people take less offence. I'm j
Yes a person has a right to express his views. However a person needs
to respect the stance of his employers. E.g. A hospital takes an
anti-abortion stance while some of its employees are pro-choice. It's
employees are free to express their opinions as individuals. Its not a
problem until they s
Except that the Creator/Producer Uploaded them to the Net - and next
they you know someone found them; also the vids were shared - so there
is no right to privacy.
Jeffrey
>
> >
> > The police videos were never intended to be public. They were
> created for
> > a closed party. Very different s
Actually no... the videos were created for the Christmas party, but
were part of something that the producing officer had created at the
website http://www.insidethesfpd.com -- I don't know yet whether or
not he had an RSS feed or not -- the media content was taken down
before more than a c
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:21:04 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Privacy is dead."
Regurgitated one-liners are useless.
--
http://www.solitude.dk/>
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~-->
Fa
"Privacy is dead."
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their
>>website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and
>>colleagues, in
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 21:53:59 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their
> website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and
> colleagues, in uniform and featuring prominently the corporate logo or
> publ
OK. Fist off...
They get all uptight about this home movie and yet Cops is just
fine? That's B.S. i think cops has done far worse for the image of
police than anything... that and showing up in cars only when there
is trouble... It's only years of getting back out there on foot and
reco
If any vlogger or budding amateur filmmaker produces and posts on their
website humourous/offensive/questionable videos of their workplace and
colleagues, in uniform and featuring prominently the corporate logo or
public brand, isn't it obviously a recipe for trouble? Try it at your
day job an
I really had trouble deciding how to vote on the
police video. I would have probably voted "amusing" or "harmless" or even
"mildly offensive" except I was really troubled by the piece where the cop
talked about being born mean.
I actually voted "shocking" (a minority) for that
reason.
i seem to recall that certain people were expected to be held to a
higher standard
oh yeah, public servants!
oh wait. I think Justice Sirrica recently said that was no longer necessary
so the new standard is the "vlogger"
i like that Enric
Enric wrote:
>OK, here's how I see this.
>
>Vid
baloney!
first, i suspect many police would say they love their job (shitty or not)
also, the pay may be better than you might think
SFPD salaries appear to be in the $45K-$110K range and with better
benefits than many other jobs
there are much, much worse paying jobs here in occupied Mexico (m
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:26:45 +0100, Deirdre Straughan
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/10/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I grew up on jokes of the "a Dane, a Norwegian and a Swede sits on a
>> mountain top..." variety.
>
> They don't go into a bar...?!?
It was i
On 12/10/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I grew up on jokes of the "a Dane, a Norwegian and a Swede sits on amountain top..." variety. They don't go into a bar...?!?-- best regards,
Deirdré Straughanwww.beginningwithi.com (personal)www.tvblob.com (work)
ah, perhaps they used their own 'personal' squad cars
Enric wrote:
--- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Markus Sandy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
that survey seems a bit lopsided to me
i wonder how the results would have changed if there a few more
reasonable choices like "a w
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 05:51:02 +0100, teaspace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know what SNL has to do with this, but my point is that police
> expect to be taken seriously when they deal with you. They also happen
> to wield a lot more power than regular folks and should probably govern
> the
that survey seems a bit lopsided to me
i wonder how the results would have changed if there a few more
reasonable choices like "a waste of people's money"?
Enric wrote:
>The poll shows most people consider them humorous (47% when I voted).
> I voted them harmless. Considering that people have
the last time i checked, 47% was not quite "most"
except possibly in Florida =)
perhaps you meant "the largest group"
Enric wrote:
>The poll shows most people consider them humorous (47% when I voted).
>
>
--
My name is Markus Sandy and I am app.etitio.us
http://apperceptions.org
http:/
I don't know what SNL has to do with this, but my point is that police
expect to be taken seriously when they deal with you. They also happen
to wield a lot more power than regular folks and should probably govern
themselves accordingly.
Having said that, I did find the police chief's 'over're
According to the last segment, only a few of the videos produced and for
which they are in trouble for, are shown there. While the clips shown
are pretty tame and possibly harmless, I would say they are
inappropriate if one is expected to take cops seriously. Do you laugh
when they draw their
22 matches
Mail list logo
