Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Josh Leo
true dat...now if that wiki could be easily printed...that would be coolOn 10/18/05, Dave Huth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Rather than hash out the details of this (what should be on the document, who should be credited, etc.) in the list, why not start a wiki? That way everyone can contribute and

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Pete Prodoehl
Josh Leo wrote: On 10/18/05, Dave Huth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Rather than hash out the details of this (what should be on the document, who should be credited, etc.) in the list, why not start a wiki? That way everyone can contribute and work it through, and those who aren't interested can

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Frank Carver
Tuesday, October 18, 2005, 4:20:20 PM, Josh Leo wrote: true dat...now if that wiki could be easily printed...that would be cool Out in the wild world of open source software development there are plenty of projects that edit their documentation on a wiki and use an automated process to scrape

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Stephanie Bryant
On 10/18/05, johngaltsjournal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here's a question: how many on this huge list are teaching videoblogging in their community? I'm just curious... and tired of this thread as it is...not that it matters. Feel free to continue down this road. *Raises hand* In a

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:58:58 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You better not try to remove my name, it'll violate my by-nc-sa license! Give me attribution or give me death! ;) You can only copyright a work, not an idea or concept. Ie. a quick rewrite later and the problem solved

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Pete Prodoehl
johngaltsjournal wrote: --- In videoblogging@yahoogroups.com, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In all seriousness, it *is* a good idea to apply a license to the things you create so that people know how they can use it. And don't forget, if you want to use it in some way that does not

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Josh Leo
yeah let's kill this beast of a thread *STAB!*On 10/18/05, Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:58:58 +0200, Pete Prodoehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You better not try to remove my name, it'll violate my by-nc-sa license! Give me attribution or give me

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-18 Thread Jan McLaughlin
Andreas, that was exactly the point of putting files up in the Yahoo groups public filespace in the first place: for folks to use as starting rather than ending points. I always intend to use the links contained in the PDF handouts but never actually have done so. It's nice to have the option.

Re: [videoblogging] Re: Putting your name on your work is legitimate!

2005-10-17 Thread Markus Sandy
not so. in fact i considered not saying anything just because i did not want to hurt Taylor's feelings. but i thought it was worth mention. pardon me if i did not do it tactfully enough. as i mentioned before, i appreciate what Taylor has done. i just prefer the example Jan has set in her