Primary for me, is the authors intent... despite that prob not being an overwhelming concern, I pref to adhere to it. Secondary is the quality... since most videos scale up with minimum distortion. I also figure that as aggregator services, their is enough tearing a part of content/context and
Not so easy... there's a lot of different formats that all treat this
differently. Also, that data is not exposed to the browser, it is
handled by the plugin.
-Josh
On 2/27/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think the movie information including the size is in the
> header of the fil
Quesiton:
Is this issue about preserving an artist's intentions or is it about
quality of video when rescaled (i.e. viewing at original size is
perceived as "best" quality)
-Josh
On 2/27/06, Enric <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I agree. At the very least an aggregator should default to the
> orig
Also, another note... there seems to be some confusion here when
talking about aggregators... Michael's original message was referring
to FireAnt.tv, which is our website. He was not referring to FireAnt
the desktop-based aggregator, which gives the user much more control
over the viewing size of t
Just a note, scaling does not mean that the aspect ratio changes.
Widescreen is still widescreen.
-Josh
On 2/27/06, David Howell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I vote for no scaling.
>
> If I wanted a larger video, I would have made a larger video to begin
> with.
>
> David
> http://www.taoofdavid
