o.edu
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Dennis Doros
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:58 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional
Streaming]
Dear Christine,
ley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Susan Albrecht
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 4:18 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional
Streaming]
At 03:58 PM 1/26/2010, you Jo Ann wrote:
>It's not that I don't
San Antonio, TX 78251
>
> 210.486.4572 voice
>
> 210.486.4504 fax
>
> *NEW NAME AND email--**ccrowl...@alamo.edu*
>
> * *
>
> *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu [mailto:
> videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] *On Behalf Of *Susan Albrecht
> *Sent:* Tu
At 03:58 PM 1/26/2010, you Jo Ann wrote:
>It's not that I don't empathize with some of your responses but . .
>. Honestly, we used to wash clothes by boiling them in pots of
>water or pounding them on rocks, there used to be no such thing as
>prepackaged food and frozen tv dinners, and we used
t: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 2:36 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional
Streaming]
Thanks, Jessica, for explaining your POV on why you think there's
significant illegal activity happening. It's still awfully unquantified
e, 26 Jan 2010 15:35:34 -0500
> To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> From: albre...@wabash.edu
> Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional Streaming]
>
> Thanks, Jessica, for explaining your POV on why you think there's
> significant illegal activity
u
Question Reality
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Susan Albrecht
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2010 3:36 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional
Streaming]
Thanks, Jessica, for
AIME President
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 15:35:34 -0500
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
From: albre...@wabash.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional Streaming]
Thanks, Jessica, for explaining your POV on why you think there's significant
illegal activity happening.
Thanks, Jessica, for explaining your POV on why
you think there's significant illegal activity
happening. It's still awfully unquantified for
my liking, but I appreciate knowing what you're
thinking of when you write that. (Thanks for the Cubs news, too.)
On this one, it's hard not to be fr
@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] [Fwd: [Videonews] More on Institutional Streaming]
I personally don't think UCLA had a leg to stand on, Jessica, so I'm not
really arguing with you.
The unit involved at UCLA isn't administratively in the library and
doesn't have a media librari
I personally don't think UCLA had a leg to stand on, Jessica, so I'm not
really arguing with you.
The unit involved at UCLA isn't administratively in the library and
doesn't have a media librarian on board, I don't believe.
BTW: Many of the comments on the blog that respond to the AIME article
h
Gary,
UCLA totally blew AIM off. They basically said we can do whatever we
want. What recourse did they have? When I see the follow up posts on
the insidehighereduction thread I am shocked at the adversarial and
rancorous nature of the educational people. Pretty much let us stream
your stuff for f
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2010/01/26/copyright
Hi all
You know what bothers me about this news item?...it's not so much the
actual substance and nature of this affair (I was pretty sure UCLA was
eventually gonna get whacked)...it's more the incredibly adversarial and
rancorous nature of
13 matches
Mail list logo
