Hello all,
I need some advice here; this is a bit new to me in terms of the legality of
use. Here is the scenario:
We are doing a big ALICE in WONDERLAND promo gig (display, film and speaker).
The student working on the PR would like to use a scene from 5 different
versions of ALICE IN
Yes, I think what Lorraine proposed is Fair Use. It's a limited portion, and
creating a mashup to advertise the event is a transformative use (i.e.
different from original purpose of entertainment).
Although I'd leave out Disney if you're feeling cautious.
p.s. the 3 minutes guideline is only a
;
> videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu> on behalf of Jessica Rosner <
> jessicapros...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:40 AM
>
> *To:* videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
> *Subject:* Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
>
> No there is NO 3 minute rule. Fair
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Wochna, Lorraine
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 11:14 AM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
Hello all,
I need some advice here; this is a bit ne
3842
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu <videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu>
on behalf of Jessica Rosner <jessicapros...@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:40 AM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
No there is NO 3 minute rule. Fai
<videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu>
on behalf of Sarah E. McCleskey <sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu>
Sent: Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:07 AM
To: 'videolib@lists.berkeley.edu'
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
Hi Lorraine,
I would do it. Sounds like fair use to me. Also, I perceive yo
& L.E. Mabee Library
>
> 4301 Broadway – CPO 297
>
> San Antonio, TX 78209
>
> (210) 829-3842
> --
> *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu <
> videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu> on behalf of Sarah E. McCleskey <
> sarah.e.mccles...@hofstra.edu>
> *Se
97
>
> San Antonio, TX 78209
>
> (210) 829-3842
> --
> *From:* videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu <
> videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu> on behalf of Jessica Rosner <
> jessicapros...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 1, 2015 11:40 AM
&
...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Brian W Boling
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 12:14 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
Hi Farhad,
Kenneth Crews at Columbia has written a fairly lengthy article on how Fair Use
...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Brian W Boling
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:14 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
Hi Farhad,
Kenneth Crews at Columbia has written a fairly lengthy article on how Fair
film to another.
Judy
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 1:10 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
Much as I wish that WAS the law
Though, I would not leave Disney out of it just because you think they will
sue:
I'm sure you all know Eric Faden's film:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJn_jC4FNDo
and Jonathan McIntosh's
http://www.rebelliouspixels.com/2010/right-wing-radio-duck-donald-discovers-glenn-beck
both use Disney
,
lorraine
From: videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu
[mailto:videolib-boun...@lists.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Jessica Rosner
Sent: Thursday, October 01, 2015 2:10 PM
To: videolib@lists.berkeley.edu
Subject: Re: [Videolib] mashup/copyright Q
not that it really matters here but pretty sure the judge
Jessica noted:
"not that it really matters here but pretty sure the judge in the GSU did
propose 10% as some absolute max which had the amusing result of upsetting both
sides."
What she said was that the 10%/1 chapter of a book with more than 10 chapters
is a "decidedly small" amount, not a
Well that is not what the appeals court said when they admonished her for
setting a 10% or one chapter "rule" . Since that part of the decision was
actually and specifically overturned and sent back it probably is not worth
arguing over especially since both sides objected ( for different
15 matches
Mail list logo
