Karli,
Before I get into the latest CMake drama. I wanted to ask a question about:
>> 1.) Boost: Namik, can you please remove all use of Boost (sources plus
>> build system files)? This is just required at very few locations, mostly
>> sparse stuff, so it shouldn't be a big deal. I'll commit som
Hi Matt,
> Before I get into the latest CMake drama. I wanted to ask a question
about:
>
> >> 1.) Boost: Namik, can you please remove all use of Boost (sources plus
> >> build system files)? This is just required at very few locations, mostly
> >> sparse stuff, so it shouldn't be a big deal.
Hi again,
> As a follow-up to my earlier email, which is likely still sitting in the
> queue do to its large size [sorry ;-) ], I wanted to ask a question
> regarding the iterative solvers.
>
> Will the GUI support benchmarking the iterative solvers? I see they are
> not part of an official benc
Hi all,
It seems I've been fighting with static qt the whole night. I still haven't
managed to compile it statically. The official script for static qt
compilation on windows does not work, of course. And manual compiling with
mingw32-make fails for no sensible reason... I sometimes feel like they
Hi,
> It seems I've been fighting with static qt the whole night. I still
> haven't managed to compile it statically. The official script for static
> qt compilation on windows does not work, of course. And manual compiling
> with mingw32-make fails for no sensible reason... I sometimes feel lik
Hey,
wait - are we allowed to link Qt statically? I thought I read something in
> the net that the open source version of Qt only allows dynamic links?
As far as I know, Qt offers three licenses:
1. Commercial - both static & dynamic, both closed & open source, may
modify Qt source code as you
Hi,
> As far as I know, Qt offers three licenses:
>
> 1. Commercial - both static & dynamic, both closed & open source, may
> modify Qt source code as you please without publishing changes, not
> required to say "This software uses Qt"
> 2. GPL - both static & dynamic, open source ONLY (so no iss
Thank you. That was incredibly informative. I'll think about it ways to
implement a benchmark as I continue my work in parallel.
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Karl Rupp wrote:
> Hi again,
>
>
> > As a follow-up to my earlier email, which is likely still sitting in the
>
>> queue do to its l
Karli,
I just wanted to update you that zlib had been empty. d'oh!
Apparently, using the GitHub GUI only cloned the benchmark directory and
libarchive but not zlip. Running the submodule update command from the
shell got me to where I needed to be!
Namik,
I am almost there. However, when I t
Hi guys,
just a quick update: I think I'm close to having something usable that
will work with both CMake and QMake... Please wait for the updates to
arrive, don't fight with the current build system.
Best regards,
Karli
On 08/02/2014 02:15 PM, Matthew Musto wrote:
> Karli,
>
> I just wanted
Hi again,
> I just wanted to update you that zlib had been empty. d'oh!
>
> Apparently, using the GitHub GUI only cloned the benchmark directory and
> libarchive but not zlip. Running the submodule update command from the
> shell got me to where I needed to be!
Okay, I've polished the whole bu
Hi,
I always got a message box telling me that a certain library cannot be
> found. Did you run the executable through the terminal, or by
> double-clicking? In worst case, you can always run in a debugger to find
> out more about the reason for a crash.
I've been running it from Qt Creator, and
Hi Matt,
thanks for the catch, this is fixed here:
https://github.com/viennacl/viennacl-dev/commit/ec267fcb0a1b21529760a54d75d3d8a9ccd05e28
Best regards,
Karli
On 08/02/2014 02:11 AM, Matthew Musto wrote:
> Hey guys,
>
> I just wanted to file a bug report.
>
> The current viennacl_dev version c
A few comments on my CMake build attempt:
While I was able to get the project up & running, the procedure is far from
pretty. There were several issues along the way:
-I fail to see the difference between previous submodules usage and the
current setup... In the end both libarchive and zlib are p
Hi all,
I couldn't help myself from trying to make a more convenient build process
for zlib and libarchive.
I added a new CMakeLists.txt to the external folder. It's purpose is to
build both zlib and libarchive in one go. It seems to work alright on my
machine. One CMake configure and one mingw32
15 matches
Mail list logo
