Re: [VM] Differences between IMAP-FCC and FCC

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: > 1. Is there any reason that IMAP-FCC doesn't include a 'From:' line whereas >FCC does include a 'From:' line? The net result is that for IMAP-FCC, >the vm summary gets the sender from the "from" line which is often then >the meaningless "VM" FCC is a feature of the E

Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: > For example, it would be nice to have a single vm-visit-any-folder > function which would visit local vs. IMAP folders depending on whether > there is a ':' (colon) in the name. > > For example: > 'foldername' = local folder 'foldername > ':foldername' = IMAP folder on d

Re: [VM] Window raise... again...

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
Johan Vromans writes: > What's keeping me from upgrading from 8.1.1. to 8.1.2 is that in the > latter version fetching new messages cause the VM subject window to > raise itself, disturbing whatever I'm doing at that moment. 8.1.2 only had minimal updates to 8.1.1. So I am surprised there is a s

Re: [VM] Window raise

2012-06-13 Thread Johan Vromans
Uday Reddy writes: > 8.1.2 only had minimal updates to 8.1.1. So I am surprised there is a > significant change. So am I. I looked through the changes and couldn't find anything related. Still it happens. > I will take a look at it. That is very much appreciated. > Why do you say "again" in

Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

2012-06-13 Thread blueman
Uday Reddy writes: > My principle is that key bindings are meant for frequently-used commands. > For others, the best option is to define aliases, e.g., > > (defalias 'imap 'vm-visit-imap-folder) > > I actually believe that the Emacs architecture is fundamentally flawed in > its overdependence o

[VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Lewis Perin
At work, the authorities have ditched the previous mail server in favor Microsoft Exchange. So far, I’ve been unable to fetch mail from the new server using my vm 8.1.1 setup for imap-ssl (the server is set up to reject “mere” imap.) By the way, I am able to get my mail using an iPhone configured

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
Lewis Perin writes: > When I submit my password for the (default) inbox, the connection fails > immediately with > > vm-imap-protocol-error: IMAP protocol error: "unexpected char (10)" Unless you have a working configuration of stunnel, I would suspect it first. If you search vm.info archives

Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

2012-06-13 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: > Unfortunately, vm itself is not just binding heavy but actually binding > dependent in that some key functions *only* seem to work when called > from a key binding rather than from M-x. I think this is true btw for > certain mark-related functions with next command uses marks. So

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Lewis Perin
Uday Reddy writes: >Lewis Perin writes: > >> When I submit my password for the (default) inbox, the connection fails >> immediately with >> >> vm-imap-protocol-error: IMAP protocol error: "unexpected char (10)" > >Unless you have a working configuration of stunnel, I would suspect it >first.

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Lewis Perin
Lewis Perin writes: >Uday Reddy writes: > >>Lewis Perin writes: >> >>> When I submit my password for the (default) inbox, the connection fails >>> immediately with >>> >>> vm-imap-protocol-error: IMAP protocol error: "unexpected char (10)" >> >>Unless you have a working configuration of stunn

Re: [VM] IMAP-SSL with Exchange Server

2012-06-13 Thread Matthew Vernon
Lewis Perin writes: > Has anyone reading this had experience connecting vm to a Microsoft > Exchange IMAP-SSL server? (Successful experience, I hope!) Yes; stunnel4 and IMAP to Exchange Just Worked; My notes suggest I didn't need the additional-configuration-file option. What it might be wort

Re: [VM] Any interest in trying to make local vs. IMAP folder treatment more seamless

2012-06-13 Thread rlk
Uday Reddy writes: > My principle is that key bindings are meant for frequently-used commands. > For others, the best option is to define aliases, e.g., > > (defalias 'imap 'vm-visit-imap-folder) > > I actually believe that the Emacs architecture is fundamentally flawed in > its overdep

Re: [VM] Differences between IMAP-FCC and FCC

2012-06-13 Thread blueman
Uday Reddy writes: > blueman writes: > >> 1. Is there any reason that IMAP-FCC doesn't include a 'From:' line whereas >>FCC does include a 'From:' line? The net result is that for IMAP-FCC, >>the vm summary gets the sender from the "from" line which is often then >>the meaningless "VM