Re: [VM] Default account for imap

2012-06-18 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: > I agree that pre-filling it in as the default is helpful in terms of > saving typing but is it really necessary from a simplicity/cleanliness > perspective. In other words, I would prefer a behavior that assumed the > default server (maybe not even a need for a colon at all) unle

Re: [VM] Default account for imap

2012-06-18 Thread blueman
Uday Reddy writes: > blueman writes: > >> Given that there is a concept of a vm-imap-default-account, I think it >> might be helpful if such a default could be used to shorten references >> to imap folders on the default account, especially since most people are >> probably just using the default

Re: [VM] Default account for imap

2012-06-18 Thread Uday Reddy
blueman writes: > Given that there is a concept of a vm-imap-default-account, I think it > might be helpful if such a default could be used to shorten references > to imap folders on the default account, especially since most people are > probably just using the default account the majority if not