On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Marcel Keller wrote:
> Claudio Orlandi schrieb:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
>>>
>>> Claudio Orlandi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
>
> Hi Claudio and Jesper,
>
> In the code rev
Claudio Orlandi schrieb:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
Claudio Orlandi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
Hi Claudio and Jesper,
In the code review of the OrlandiRuntime we found two points, we want to
discuss with you.
Step 3 of the triple
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
> Claudio Orlandi wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Claudio and Jesper,
>>>
>>> In the code review of the OrlandiRuntime we found two points, we want to
>>> discuss with you.
>>>
>>> Step 3 of the tri
Claudio Orlandi wrote:
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
Hi Claudio and Jesper,
In the code review of the OrlandiRuntime we found two points, we want to
discuss with you.
Step 3 of the triple generation protocol says: Coin-flip a subset \fancy_T
\subset \fancy_M of size \la
On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Marcel Keller wrote:
> Hi Claudio and Jesper,
>
> In the code review of the OrlandiRuntime we found two points, we want to
> discuss with you.
>
> Step 3 of the triple generation protocol says: Coin-flip a subset \fancy_T
> \subset \fancy_M of size \lambda(2d + 1)M.
Hi Claudio and Jesper,
In the code review of the OrlandiRuntime we found two points, we want to
discuss with you.
Step 3 of the triple generation protocol says: Coin-flip a subset
\fancy_T \subset \fancy_M of size \lambda(2d + 1)M. The current
implementation loops over the elements in \fancy
