Yes, it is what I tried to do.
To ensure this, I put the Makefile in a subdirectory not linked by
other Makefile. So, the "make" must be manually activated on this
directory.
sounds good
But I'm not really sure abou one aspect: dependencies. Is this change
brings some new dependencie
Hi,
2011/3/11 Greg Troxel :
>
> If this is for building docs about the source code, a la doxygen, then
> it would be nice if it's possible to easily build viking without this
> documentation, while simultaneously allowing those who are hacking on it
> to have the docs. Is that what you think you
If this is for building docs about the source code, a la doxygen, then
it would be nice if it's possible to easily build viking without this
documentation, while simultaneously allowing those who are hacking on it
to have the docs. Is that what you think you did?
pgp1hQ4wS4ObE.pgp
Description:
