On 2007-05-06, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gary Johnson wrote:
I noticed that filetype.vim does not include the patch that I
submitted to this list 2006-07-25 to fix the recognition of mutt
temporary files on SunOS. Is there something else I can do to have
this patch
Michael Wookey wrote:
Hello vim list,
I've just synced up to 7.1a.001 (svn #263) and built on Win32 (MSVC).
Everything builds fine and I replace my previous gvim.exe and vim.exe
with the newly built versions. I also sync my runtime from
ftp.nluug.nl.
My vim installation is in:
On 2007-05-06, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-05-05, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Compiles as a breeze :-).
Yes indeed. I've compiled it so far on SunOS 5.8 and HP-UX 10.20.
I may try Cygwin if I'm feeling adventurous enough. I've never done
that except
Any ideas?
Maybe you can rename all your directories named Vim70 to Vim71a.
Yep - that was it.
C:\Vim\vim70 was renamed to C:\Vim\vim71a and all is well.
Thanks! (and also thanks to Tony for the troubleshooting hints)
I've had similar problem with 7.1a BETA (from CVS) on Mandriva 2006.
Solved by removing old directory and fresh checkout.
m.
Zobacz, jaką walkę stoczy superbohater, by ocalić siebie
i swych bliskich. A największa bitwa rozegra się w jego
On Sun, 06 May 2007 14:46:22 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Henry wrote:
Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2007-05-05, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(Warning: In the ln command as used here, the target name comes
before the link name. I find this
Hi list,
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to compile
it with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400
-DHAVE_PATHDEF -DFEAT_BIG -DHAVE_GETTEXT -DHAVE_LOCALE_H
Matthew Winn wrote:
On Sun, 06 May 2007 14:46:22 +0200, A.J.Mechelynck
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Henry wrote:
I used to find this hard to remember until I realized that 'ln' and 'cp'
are very similar.
The problem is, cp -v file1 file2 outputs
`file1' - `file2'
(the data
Markus Trenkwalder wrote:
Hi list,
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to compile it
with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400
-DHAVE_PATHDEF -DFEAT_BIG -DHAVE_GETTEXT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know this is sortof late notice, but it would be great if this could go in 7.1
final :)
The empty comment is still there. Just leave that line blank. No
biggie, of course, just aesthetics.
i could have sworn i fixed it. this time, though, it
On 5/5/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA
I compared runtime files form ftp [1] and from svn [2].
Both vims are labeled vim71a. But many runtimes are different.
In svn, many files are labeled 2007. In ftp, they are 2006 versions.
Why
Since C-c is supposed to act like Esc in most circumstances, one
would expect that pressing C-c to end Insert mode during a visual
block insert would prepend the text to all selected lines. In fact,
This was the behavior in versions of Vim prior to vim7. As it currently
stands, pressing C-c will
Markus Trenkwalder wrote:
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to compile
it with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400
-DHAVE_PATHDEF -DFEAT_BIG -DHAVE_GETTEXT
Jonathan Smith wrote:
I know this is sortof late notice, but it would be great if this could
go in 7.1 final :)
The empty comment is still there. Just leave that line blank. No
biggie, of course, just aesthetics.
i could have sworn i fixed it. this time, though, it really is fixed.
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Patch 7.1a.001
Problem:Crash when downloading a spell file. (Szabolcs Horvat)
Solution: Avoid that did_set_spelllang() is used recursively when a new
window is opened for the download.
Also avoid wiping out the wrong
Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
Hey All,
Patch 7.1a.001
I managed to compile 7.1a from cvs yesterday. I went and did a cvs up
to grab this patch and I am now getting this error:
gui_w32.c:236: error: redefinition of `struct tagNMTTDISPINFOA'
gui_w32.c:246: error: redefinition of `struct
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/5/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA
I compared runtime files form ftp [1] and from svn [2].
Both vims are labeled vim71a. But many runtimes are different.
In svn, many files are labeled 2007. In ftp, they
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i feel committed, and will commence chasing
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Markus Trenkwalder wrote:
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to
compile it with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400 -D_WIN32_WINNT=0x0400
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/5/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA
I compared runtime files form ftp [1] and from svn [2].
Both vims are labeled vim71a. But many runtimes are
On 5/8/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Full diffs are attached. Diffs are produced by the script diff-vim-ftp-svn.sh,
also attached.
Re-sending attachments which came out zero-length in previous email.
Yakov
diffs
Description: Binary data
diff-vim-ftp-svn.sh
Description: Bourne
On 5/6/07, Sebastian Menge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
Independent of the implementation used, I suggest to develop good
guidelines. The Wiki should be really valuable and not redundant to
vim-tips or mailing-lists.
I would like to make another implementation independent suggestion; one
On 5/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Trenkwalder wrote:
Hi list,
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to compile it
with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400
On 5/8/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/8/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yakov Lerner wrote:
On 5/5/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Announcing: Vim (Vi IMproved) version 7.1a BETA
I compared runtime files form ftp [1] and from svn [2].
Both
On 5/8/07, scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was surpised by the fact that simply running 'svn update' bumped me up to
7.1a -- from previous posts i had thought there was something extra that had
to be done to get the beta, like create a new 71a directory or something
now i've got the beta i
On 5/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Markus Trenkwalder wrote:
Hi list,
checked out vim-7.1a.001 today from svn (#263) and tried to compile it
with mingw-gcc and got the following error:
8
$ make -f Make_ming.mak
gcc -c -Iproto -DWIN32 -DWINVER=0x0400
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
[...]
I notice this patch modifies one runtime file. This reminds me that runtime
updates are not always reflected in patches. Do the files in
ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/runtime/ (and the equivalent rsync repository,
ftp.nluug.nl::Vim/runtime/ )
Edward L. Fox wrote:
On 5/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You're not the first; there seems to have been a f*ckup in the svn commit
lately. I suggest you scrap your existing 7.1a sources and restart from
scratch, by downloading the 7.1a.000 sources then applying the
On 5/8/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
On 5/7/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
You're not the first; there seems to have been a f*ckup in the svn commit
lately. I suggest you scrap your existing 7.1a sources and restart from
scratch, by
29 matches
Mail list logo
