Edd:
If you do not get a reply soon from Bram, it probably means that he
is not following this thread. If so, I suggest writing directly to him
again, including an updated version of the patch and a summary of the
feedback you got from the list. Bram has the final say in what becomes
part
On 16/09/06, Benji Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I agree that enclosing the whole file in and tags is not
very helpful.
HTH --Benji Fisher
Can we conclude that the patch is ok to be included in vim?
Best Regards
Edd
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 01:37:57PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 15/09/06, Benji Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >I think the decision of
> >whether to include the tags should be based on principles of logical
> >mark-up: are these naturally paragraphs?
>
> This depends upon if you are writ
On 15/09/06, Benji Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think the decision of
whether to include the tags should be based on principles of logical
mark-up: are these naturally paragraphs?
This depends upon if you are writing a book or some code. The spacing
of the lines should be governed by t
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 08:27:01PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
> On 14/09/06, Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dnia sobota, 9 września 2006 20:03, Edd Barrett napisał:
> >>
> >> - I removed 's because you cannot contain a in a according
> >> to w3. An unstyled would make no differe
On 14/09/06, Mikolaj Machowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dnia sobota, 9 września 2006 20:03, Edd Barrett napisał:
>
> - I removed 's because you cannot contain a in a according
> to w3. An unstyled would make no difference in this case anyway.
While I agree with most of your changes *where*
Dnia sobota, 9 września 2006 20:03, Edd Barrett napisał:
>
> - I removed 's because you cannot contain a in a according
> to w3. An unstyled would make no difference in this case anyway.
While I agree with most of your changes *where* cannot be inside of
?
m.
Hi Benji,
You are absolutely correct. This must have slipped past me. I have
ammended my patch. New patch is here:
http://arameus.net/users/edd/vim-test/2html.vim.diff
Thankyou for your support.
Best Regards
Edd
PS,
Does anyone know how to disable HTML sending in gmail? Ezalm does not
li
On Sat, Sep 09, 2006 at 07:03:14PM +0100, Edd Barrett wrote:
>
> Here is the patch: http://arameus.net/users/edd/vim-test/2html.vim.diff
>
> Also in the same directory you will see the output of my tests, please
> test them on other browsers.
I viewed the output using the following systems
Hello vim-dev,
I really liked the "Convert to HTML" function in gvim, but wished that
it could be a little more "correct" in terms of the w3 standard. So I
wrote a patch. Here is an outline of what I have done:
- The script used to only declare a if CSS was enabled
(html_use_css). All (X)HTML
10 matches
Mail list logo
