with minimal hassle.
Wasn't that sort of my argument?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript prevent these interesting possibilities?
I don't see why you have to replace VimScript with ECMAScript to get
On 4/25/07, Robert Lee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
The only question that is really relevant here is: why it isn't enough
with having an ECMAScript extension instead of having it replace
VimScript?
The following arguments have been given:
1. Because people wouldn't
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I mean, seriously, it's a lot more intuitive to write
Vim.options['formatoptions'] =
Vim.options['formatoptions'].replace('t',
)
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMAScript is the most popular language among
the people that wish to customize
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
As a sarcastic joke, this sounds average. But seriously, vim
having supprt for
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMAScript is the
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I
On 4/24/07, Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
As a sarcastic joke,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:57:45PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 05:49:19PM +0200, Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2007 at 10:49:49AM +0300, Ilya Sher wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript
Nikolai Weibull wrote:
On 4/24/07, Ilya Sher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert Lee wrote:
[snip]
Counterwish #2: Dump VimScript and replace it with EMCAScript (maybe
using SpiderMonkey) so that people don't need to learn a new language
If I understand you correctly, you assume that
ECMAScript
Yakov Lerner wrote:
[snip]
So do not worry, replacement of vimscript by the favourite language
of some vim's random user is not going to happen.
That is obvious. The point was the question why the OP named
language X and not Y for this.
Yakov
--
For robots (please don't mail me there):
?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript prevent these interesting possibilities?
I don't see why you have to replace VimScript with ECMAScript to get
ECMAScripts do what can be done with the, for example, Ruby
.
Wasn't that sort of my argument?
Are there lots of VimScript libraries that are
outside the application domain? So how does replacing VimScript with
ECMAScript prevent these interesting possibilities?
I don't see why you have to replace VimScript with ECMAScript to get
ECMAScripts do what can
16 matches
Mail list logo
