Re: BufWinEnter autocmd is not invoked when splitting a window

2006-09-03 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Yegappan Lakshmanan wrote: > The BufWinEnter autocmd is not invoked when splitting a window. > According to the help for the BufWinEnter autocmd, this autocmd > is invoked when a buffer is displayed in a window. > > For example, use the following autocmd: > >au BufWinEnter * echomsg "Enteri

Patch 7.0.082

2006-09-03 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.0.082 Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List and Dictionary arguments to be freed by the garbage collector. Solution: Keep a list of all arguments to internal functions. Files: src/eval.c *** ../vim-7.0.081/src/eval.c Sat Sep 2 13:45:01 2

Patch 7.0.083

2006-09-03 Thread Bram Moolenaar
Patch 7.0.083 Problem:Clicking with the mouse on an item for inputlist() doesn't work when 'compatible' is set and/or when 'cmdheight' is more than one. (Christian J. Robinson) Solution: Also decrement "lines_left" when 'more' isn't set. Set "cmdline_row

Re: Patch 7.0.082

2006-09-03 Thread Bram Moolenaar
I wrote: > Patch 7.0.082 > Problem:Calling a function that waits for input may cause List and > Dictionary arguments to be freed by the garbage collector. > Solution: Keep a list of all arguments to internal functions. > Files:src/eval.c I vaguely recall that some peo

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Ilya
Yakov Lerner wrote: When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it started to work as expected. No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed String. Like this: { Some string with a quote ( " ) inside } With ''kepend extend', it apparently takes identifier-closing brac

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/3/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: > When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it > started to work as expected. No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed String. Like this: { Some string with a quote ( " ) inside } Ah, I have a guess wh

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Ilya
Yakov Lerner wrote: On 9/3/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: > When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it > started to work as expected. No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed String. Like this: { Some string with a quote ( " ) inside }

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Ilya
Sorry for duplicating, but my mailer for some reason removed several spaces from my "pictures". Yakov Lerner wrote: On 9/3/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: > When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it > started to work as expected. No, it would not work as I want it

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/2/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I expect it to. What I want: match syntax that consists of blocks (enclosed in {}), strings (enclose

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Ilya
Yakov Lerner wrote: On 9/2/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello. I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I expect it to. What I want: match syntax that consists of blocks (enclosed in

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/3/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: > When I removed both 'keepend' and 'extend', it > started to work as expected. No, it would not work as I want it to. Block would not end unclosed String. Like this: { Some string with a quote ( " ) inside } What about the follow

Re: Syntax matching. extend inside normal inside keepend

2006-09-03 Thread Yakov Lerner
On 9/3/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yakov Lerner wrote: > On 9/2/06, Ilya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello. >> >> I have a question regarding syntax matching. I have some kind of syntax >> and I have some solution to highlight it, but it does not work the way I >> expect it to. >> >> W

Building +perl and +mzscheme on Ubuntu

2006-09-03 Thread George V. Reilly
I'm trying to build a full-featured Vim 7.076 on Ubuntu 6.06. I have all the packages listed at http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/edgy/editors/vim-full as well as libncurses5-dev, libxt-dev, libgtk2.0-dev to build a basic Gvim, and mzscheme, ruby1.8-dev, tcl8.4-dev which suffices to build

Re: Building +perl and +mzscheme on Ubuntu

2006-09-03 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
George V. Reilly wrote: I'm trying to build a full-featured Vim 7.076 on Ubuntu 6.06. I have all the packages listed at http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/edgy/editors/vim-full as well as libncurses5-dev, libxt-dev, libgtk2.0-dev to build a basic Gvim, and mzscheme, ruby1.8-dev, tcl8.4-dev

Re: Building +perl and +mzscheme on Ubuntu

2006-09-03 Thread George V. Reilly
A.J.Mechelynck wrote: George V. Reilly wrote: I'm trying to build a full-featured Vim 7.076 on Ubuntu 6.06. I have all the packages listed at http://packages.ubuntulinux.org/edgy/editors/vim-full as well as libncurses5-dev, libxt-dev, libgtk2.0-dev to build a basic Gvim, and mzscheme,

Re: Building +perl and +mzscheme on Ubuntu

2006-09-03 Thread A.J.Mechelynck
George V. Reilly wrote: [...] Adding libperl-dev got me +perl. I still haven't figured out +mzscheme. [...] Well, search the list of additional installable packages for something like mzscheme-dev or libmzscheme-dev... or maybe libmzsch209_000.dev, libmzgc209_000.dev, or whatever. If there is