Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> I'm doing some performance investigations of Vim code trying to
> understand whether there are any possibilities to improve it.
> Currently I've made the following observations (all investigations are
> done on Windows):
>
> Redundant work is done during regexp operati
Patch 7.0.190
Problem:"syntax spell default" results in an error message.
Solution: Change 4 to 7 for STRNICMP(). (Raul Nunez de Arenas Coronado)
Files: src/syntax.c
*** ../vim-7.0.189/src/syntax.c Wed Nov 1 12:43:07 2006
--- src/syntax.cSun Jan 21 13:12:19 2007
*
Patch 7.0.189
Problem:Translated message about finding matches is truncated. (Yukihiro
Nakadaira)
Solution: Enlarge the buffer. Also use vim_snprintf().
Files: src/edit.c
*** ../vim-7.0.188/src/edit.c Wed Nov 1 21:24:58 2006
--- src/edit.c Fri Jan 19 20:22:09 2007
**
Patch 7.0.191
Problem:The items used by getqflist() and setqflist() don't match.
Solution: Support the "bufnum" item for setqflist(). (Yegappan Lakshmanan)
Files: runtime/doc/eval.txt, src/quickfix.c
*** ../vim-7.0.190/runtime/doc/eval.txt Wed Nov 1 15:31:02 2006
--- runtime/doc/eva
On 2/4/07, Bram Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> I'm doing some performance investigations of Vim code trying to
> understand whether there are any possibilities to improve it.
> Currently I've made the following observations (all investigations are
> done on Wind
On 2/4/07, Yakov Lerner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gnu malloc (glibc) is exceptionally fast, iirc.
Yes. It's based on Doug Lea's malloc:
http://gee.cs.oswego.edu/dl/html/malloc.html
nikolai
Hi All!
Do I understand it correct that EXITFREE define in Vim source code can be used
to make sure all resources are cleaned up on exit (and those which are not
should be treated as leaks)? To be able to use it on Windows I had to do the
following changes:
Index: misc2.c
=
In
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 4 2007 03:42:30)
Included patches: 1-191
Compiled by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
[...]
exists(":simalt") or exists(":tearoff") return 2; however trying to use them
results in
E319: S
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> >
> > The idea to gradually increase the chunk size makes sense, but not
> > everywhere. For the syntax stack it's probably better to start with a
> > stack that is mostly needed, then growing quite quickly (say double the
> > chunk size every time). That's because wh
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
> Do I understand it correct that EXITFREE define in Vim source code can
> be used to make sure all resources are cleaned up on exit (and those
> which are not should be treated as leaks)? To be able to use it on
> Windows I had to do the following changes:
Thanks for th
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
> In
>
> VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 4 2007 03:42:30)
> Included patches: 1-191
> Compiled by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
> [...]
>
> exists(":simalt") or exists(":tearoff") return 2; howeve
[Previous copy was bounced by vim.org because it wasn't plaintext. Sorry
for any duplicates.]
George V. Reilly wrote:
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Alexei Alexandrov wrote:
Do I understand it correct that EXITFREE define in Vim source code can
be used to make sure all resources are cleaned up on e
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
In
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Feb 4 2007 03:42:30)
Included patches: 1-191
Compiled by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI. Features included (+) or not (-):
[...]
exists(":simalt") or exists(":tearoff") return 2;
13 matches
Mail list logo
