Ian Tegebo wrote:
On 4/27/07, Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jonathan Smith wrote:
With the insane number of patches collecting against 7.0, and
presumably the new features accumulating in the devel tree, is anyone
thinking about when a 7.1 release might be made?
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
That's pretty nasty. I'll make a patch right away.
Thanks. However, perhaps the modeline concept needs
more safety - defence in depth.
Perhaps modelines should only allow a VERY limited set
of operations by default (even more restricted than now).
Googling for 'vim
Tomas Golembiovsky wrote:
today somebody came to #vim, and pasted some modeline (containig
joke or such).
Thanks for raising that issue. I found the April 1 joke with Google.
I actually noticed that posting (seeing Vim while browsing a security
list caught my attention), but there's so much
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Perhaps modelines should only allow a VERY limited set
of operations by default (even more restricted than now).
Sure, simply use :set nomodeline.
I'm suggesting defence in depth. My vimrc might have
':set nomodeline', but what if I make a mistake? What if I'm
using
Hello,
--- Yegappan Lakshmanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Gary,
On 4/27/07, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-27, Gary Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2007-04-26, Navdeep Parhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Currently :cscope has a variant :lcscope that
Hi all,
I've just joined this list. I'm not a vim developer per se. However, I
put together jVi, http://jvi.sourceforge.net , whose core is a port of
some of vim to java. It runs on NetBeans ( and JBuilder, but not
supported any more). jVi is based on vim-5.6.
A jVi user has added visual
