On 10/25/06, Peter Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured that it was easier to add items to a cluster using
containedin= for a syntax definition I'm writing, but it seems that
one can't do it that way. Is there a reason for this, or is it
On 10/25/06, Peter Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/25/06, Peter Hodge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured that it was easier to add items to a cluster using
containedin= for a syntax
--- Nikolai Weibull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I figured that it was easier to add items to a cluster using
containedin= for a syntax definition I'm writing, but it seems that
one can't do it that way. Is there a reason for this, or is it an
oversight? Can we add this to the todo? I've
