Marvin Renich wrote:
* Bram Moolenaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060906 17:07]:
After you do :set nohidden there still is one hidden buffer. Thus the
first TestBuf() after that will work a bit different from the next ones.
I do see a problem: The info about the current buffer is displayed
Bram,
In a thread started here [0] back in July I reported a problem I was
having with messages not being displayed in the right order. It was
determined during that thread that there was a difference of behavior
based on whether hidden was set or not. Buried in one of the later
messages, I
Marvin Renich wrote:
In a thread started here [0] back in July I reported a problem I was
having with messages not being displayed in the right order. It was
determined during that thread that there was a difference of behavior
based on whether hidden was set or not. Buried in one of the
* A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060723 22:23]:
Bram: 'exe silent command' apparently does not give the same
result as ':silent exe command' (see example below). Bug or feature?
gvim -N -u NONE
:version
VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Jul 23 2006 22:50:51)
* Yakov Lerner [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060724 05:27]:
'silent!' in front of (exec b . bufnr) works, no ? The following
:args a b
:silent! 'exec b 2'
:silent! 'exec b 1'
:echomsg AAA
works for me. Output from 'b #' commands is suppresses, only
AAA is printd.
Yakov
This
I am enhancing my cyclecolor script and would like to use another
buffer, but would like to do it as transparently as possible.
I use bufnr(filename, 1) to create a new buffer, then save the current
buffer number, switch to the new buffer, do some things, and switch
back. Later in the script, I
Marvin Renich wrote:
I am enhancing my cyclecolor script and would like to use another
buffer, but would like to do it as transparently as possible.
I use bufnr(filename, 1) to create a new buffer, then save the current
buffer number, switch to the new buffer, do some things, and switch
back.
On Sun 23-Jul-06 7:09pm -0600, Marvin Renich wrote:
At this point, I see the output from exec b curbuf but using
:messages I can see that the echomsg did indeed display (before the
output from :b). I also tried redraw between the :b and the :echomsg.
I don't have an answer for you but I
