Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question

2009-05-19 Thread Adriaan S .
Thanks alot for the clear explanation. Because I'm still into learning VIM, I don't think I will be able to contribute anything soon. Maybe in the future... cheerz _ Op MSN Video vind je de leukste filmpjes! http://video.msn.com/vi

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question

2009-05-19 Thread Ted Pavlic
> When people notice a bug to fix or a feature to add, they post [PATCH]es > to the list, and those patches get merged into the SVN repo by one of > the Vim-LaTeX admins (usually Till Maas). In case I wasn't 100% clear, the SVN repo is not just a collection of patches. It is a full and evolving r

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question

2009-05-19 Thread Ted Pavlic
forge (the last one was 2 weeks > ago)? > Are they patches or something? > > > > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:12:50 -0400 > > From: t...@tedpavlic.com > > To: vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > Subject: Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question > > &g

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question

2009-05-19 Thread Adriaan S .
Okey, thanks alot. And what about the subversions on scourceforge (the last one was 2 weeks ago)?Are they patches or something? > Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 08:12:50 -0400 > From: t...@tedpavlic.com > To: vim-latex-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Subject: Re: [Vim-latex-devel] gene

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] general question

2009-05-19 Thread Ted Pavlic
I don't know if anyone plans to make a new release anytime soon, but the 2006 version should be sufficient for most users. Not too much has changed with respect to aspects of LaTeX that Vim-LaTeX helps you with. That is, Vim-LaTeX isn't really tied to a particular set of package versions. --Te