Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Ted Pavlic
Since no one else has responded to this yet, I'll add my probably useless comments... > I fiddled arround with git subtree, but I can't get it work. Does anybody > know, how I can merge the subdirectory vimfiles into my subdirectory vim?? Personally, I'm just using rsync (actually, there's an ol

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Ted Pavlic
> I know more about hg than git. In hg, there is a "convert" that allows In fact, if you were willing to manage your conf repo with Mercurial, you could probably use convert to do all of the work for you. The simplest thing you'd want would be: hg convert --filemap vimfiles_only /path/to/vim-la

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Gerd Wachsmuth
Hi, I'm looking forward when Till will put vimfiles/ in a separate repo (or branch). Then I can use the method described in http://vimcasts.org/episodes/synchronizing-plugins-with-git-submodules-and-pathogen/ This sounds very handy. I think I will also publish my configuration at github. Best

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Ted Pavlic
> I'm looking forward when Till will put vimfiles/ in a separate repo (or > branch). Then I can use the method described in It would make sense to split out the web and the vimfiles into two separate repos. However, is that really necessary? I haven't used pathogen before, but it looks like you

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Till Maas
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 01:52:37PM -0500, Ted Pavlic wrote: > > I'm looking forward when Till will put vimfiles/ in a separate repo (or > > branch). Then I can use the method described in > > It would make sense to split out the web and the vimfiles into two > separate repos. However, is that rea

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Ted Pavlic
>> It would make sense to split out the web and the vimfiles into two >> separate repos. However, is that really necessary? > > What disadvantages do you see? I am pretty sure that most of vim-latex None aside from the grunt work. My comment was sort of an "in the meanwhile, symlinks with pathoge

Re: [Vim-latex-devel] Merging vim-latex/master:vimfiles into local repo

2011-02-18 Thread Gerd Wachsmuth
>> The only potential issue I see is that after the splitting of the >> repository, they will have different commit ids than the original >> repository had. Since the repository is not published that long, I tend >> to think that this is not important. > > That probably won't be much of an issue...