-Original Message-
From: Yongwei Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1. juni 2007 07:32
To: vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: OT: Vi in a browser...
On 31/05/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
[...]
A friend told me that he is developing a Firefox addon
Hi Thomas,
On 01/06/07, Thomas Svensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Yongwei Wu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1. juni 2007 07:32
To: vim@vim.org
Subject: Re: OT: Vi in a browser...
On 31/05/07, A.J.Mechelynck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Edward L. Fox wrote:
Hi jaywee,
The simplest way is using a mapping
inoremap { {cr}escO
which should do what you want.
But I myself find this terrible annying because it always inserts those
closing braces.
That's why I've written some kind of context sensitive completion
I'm having the same problem, and the three solutions don't work for me.
In all the three solutions (and even the other thread I started with
your reply windo diffthis) doesn't work.
What happens is that one window folds the complete file to one line.
The other window keeps the file open as it
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:05:53PM +0800, jaywee wrote:
mostly when I press {, I have to press one more } after, because
they are always appears at the same time! the same as () [], and
also the quote mark(). so I wonder how can I add the feature that when
I insert { or the other
I am looking for a small extension to :TOhtml and I wonder if it can be
done already, extists as a plug-in or if this is an itch I will have to
scratch.
This is what I want: I have a file, let's say myapp.c, which should be
converted to (X)HTML with syntax highlighting intact. So far so good, it
Hi, all.
In insert mode command C-] expand abbreviation.
How to call this command in function?
I try this way:
execute normal i\C-]
but it simply put ^] in text.
--
Serhiy Boiko
CRIS-UANIC
Personally, I don't agree with you. When editing short text
items on web pages, I feel that the overhead of copying/pasting
back and forth from vim is too much. I am currently using the
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file, analogous to ^A in other
Gene Kwiecinski wrote:
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file, analogous to ^A in other systems?
To copy the entire file to the system clipboard, you can do:
:%y+
Rpelace y with d if you want to cut instead of copy.
Replace + with * if you want
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file, analogous to ^A in other systems? I have to essentially do
1GVGctl-del
to stick everything into the scratchpad/clipboard/whatever to dump it
back into the item from whence it originally came, and that's
In the old gvim, doing a search (/something) highlights all
something in red. In gvim 7, it doesn't highlight all occurrences.
Is there a way to turn this back on?
Thanks!
In the old gvim, doing a search (/something) highlights all
something in red. In gvim 7, it doesn't highlight all occurrences.
Is there a way to turn this back on?
It sounds like in the process, a vimrc (system-wide?) was
changed. You don't mention your distro/OS, so it's hard to help
there.
Gene Kwiecinski wrote:
Personally, I don't agree with you. When editing short text
items on web pages, I feel that the overhead of copying/pasting
back and forth from vim is too much. I am currently using the
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file,
Hi all, first post.
Been a long long time vi user but bizarrely never made the jump to vim
until quite recently.
I'm editing a lot of complex html/cake-php thtml templates at the
moment and despite
useful color highlighting I'm finding it quite difficult to see the
wood for the trees due to
the
Been a long long time vi user but bizarrely never made the
jump to vim until quite recently.
Welcome!
I'm editing a lot of complex html/cake-php thtml templates at
the moment and despite useful color highlighting I'm finding
it quite difficult to see the wood for the trees due to the
On 2007-06-01, Tushar Desai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was previously able to do :scriptfile for vim 7.1 (on Fedora Core
6), when I was debugging why my plugins won't work. Then to check if
plugins would work in vim 7.0, I did a make install from vim 7.0.
Since they didn't seem to work in
On 6/1/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the old gvim, doing a search (/something) highlights all
something in red. In gvim 7, it doesn't highlight all occurrences.
Is there a way to turn this back on?
It sounds like in the process, a vimrc (system-wide?) was
changed. You don't
Tushar Desai wrote:
I was previously able to do :scriptfile for vim 7.1 (on Fedora Core
6), when I was debugging why my plugins won't work. Then to check if
plugins would work in vim 7.0, I did a make install from vim 7.0.
Since they didn't seem to work in vim 7.0, I reverted back to vim 7.1,
by
On 6/1/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Speaking of which, is there any quicker way to visually select the
entire file, analogous to ^A in other systems? I have to essentially do
1GVGctl-del
to stick everything into the scratchpad/clipboard/whatever to dump it
back into the
On 5/30/07, Tim Chase [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just stumbled across this link:
http://gpl.internetconnection.net/vi/
for a basic implementation of Vi, authored in JavaScript. Sick,
sick, sick. So just in case you're on a foreign computer that
doesn't have vi/vim installed, and you need a
Howard Glynn wrote:
In essence I would like to collapse huge (single) lines of tags to
something like a id=xyz href=/img ...
There is a simple solution, maybe too simple, but... if you only have
one tag per line, or if you can reformat your file in such a way, it
might be enough to disable
Howard Glynn wrote:
snip
I wondered whether there was a plugin somewhere that was able to
abbreviate or
partially hide the detail so i can see the overall structure more
clearly. In essence I
would like to collapse huge (single) lines of tags to something like
a id=xyz
href=/img ... -
Brian E. Lozier wrote:
In the old gvim, doing a search (/something) highlights all
something in red. In gvim 7, it doesn't highlight all occurrences.
Is there a way to turn this back on?
I suspect that you may be having problems because you made changes to
files in
files in your former
On 6/1/07, Charles E Campbell Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Howard Glynn wrote:
snip
I wondered whether there was a plugin somewhere that was able to
abbreviate or
partially hide the detail so i can see the overall structure more
clearly. In essence I
would like to collapse huge (single)
Tushar Desai wrote:
sorry ... my bad. it is scriptnames and not scriptfiles.
but, my plugins still won't work. :-(
regards,
-tushar.
If nothing else avails, you may try executing Vim step-by-step, see :help
debug-scripts.
Best regards,
Tony.
--
The price of seeking to force our beliefs
Eric Leenman wrote:
I'm having the same problem, and the three solutions don't
work for me. In all the three solutions (and even the other
thread I started with your reply windo diffthis) doesn't work.
What happens is that one window folds the complete file to one
line. The other window keeps
27 matches
Mail list logo
