Re: Proposal for a new logo

imply be revamped. > > I agree. I like the current(old) logo. > > Yakov As we seem to be voting informally, I like the current one too. Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles)

gvim not reading gvimrc

th an absolute path namea. And gvim -U /home/ac/.gvimrc also doesn't bring it up. Can anyone suggest what is happening here? Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and

Re: gvim not reading gvimrc

On 17 Apr 2006, Yakov Lerner wrote: > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've just had to reinstall vim after a crash of X on my Debian system > > (Sid) > > > > Vim reads its .vimrc file correctly but gvim does not read .gvimrc. &

Re: gvim not reading gvimrc -SOLVED

On 17 Apr 2006, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 17 Apr 2006, Yakov Lerner wrote: > > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I've just had to reinstall vim after a crash of X on my Debian system > > > (Sid) > > > > > > Vi

Can't compile gui version with xorg

I want to compile vim6.4 for my recently upgraded xorg. This is because the Debian packages all lack the help.txt file for some reason, even though I've installed vim-doc. But vim compiles without the gui (gtk version). Any way to get it to do this? Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Thomas Adam wrote: > > --- Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > But vim compiles without the gui (gtk version). Any way to get it to do > > this? > > Well, can you tell us what's in config.log? I suspect you're missing som

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Chris Allen wrote: > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > configure:2673: checking for X > > configure:3532: checking if X11 header files can be found > > configure:3543: gcc -c -g -O2conftest.c 1>&5 > > configure:

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Yakov Lerner wrote: > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2006, Chris Allen wrote: > > > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > configure:2673: checking for X > > > &g

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Chris Allen wrote: > On 4/17/06, Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I want to compile vim6.4 for my recently upgraded xorg. This is because > > the Debian packages all lack the help.txt file for some reason, even > > though I've in

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Thor Andreassen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2006, Thomas Adam wrote: > > > > > > --- Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > But vim compiles

Re: Can't compile gui version with xorg

On 17 Apr 2006, Thor Andreassen wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 06:01:23PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > On 17 Apr 2006, Thor Andreassen wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2006 at 04:29:30PM +0100, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > > > On 17 Apr 2006, Thomas Adam wrote: &g

Hardcopy no longer works

slrn. This is with vim64, on Linux Debian. I get :hardcopy on the command line and the printer lights flash but nothing happens. Is there somewhere I can set the font for hardcopy? Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian

Re: Hardcopy no longer works

On 24 Apr 2006, Anthony Campbell wrote: > I've always been able to print my files directly from gvim using the > print command in the File menu. > > Now it no longer works, following recent upgrades to xorg 7.0. I think > this may be something to do with a font problem, whi

Re: Hardcopy no longer works - SOLVED

On 24 Apr 2006, Anthony Campbell wrote: > On 24 Apr 2006, Anthony Campbell wrote: > > I've always been able to print my files directly from gvim using the > > print command in the File menu. > > > > Now it no longer works, following recent upgrades to xorg 7.0. I

Spellcheck in vim 7.0 doesn't seem to work

ght place I'd be grateful. Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles)

Re: Spellcheck in vim 7.0 doesn't seem to work

On 16 May 2006, Georg Dahn wrote: > Hi! > > --- Anthony Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The commmand :SpellCheck gives "Not an editor command" and \ss does > > nothing. I do have ispell in place. > > Obviously, there is no editor command &quo

Re: Spellcheck in vim 7.0 doesn't seem to work

On 16 May 2006, Pete Johns wrote: > On Tue, 2006-05-16 at 09:52:29 +0100, Anthony Campbell sent: > >Thanks for the clarification. These commands work fine, which is > >what I was looking for. But ":h spell" produces information only > >about vimspell and vimspell

Re: Preserving undo through save

iour? The help-file for "undo" is pretty silent regarding this. > > Regards, > > Thomas Engelke > That doesn't happen here. Anthony -- Anthony Campbell - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microsoft-free zone - Using Linux Gnu-Debian http://www.acampbell.org.uk (blog, book reviews, on-line books and sceptical articles)

Entering citations (footnotes) in vim

Is there any simple way to add numbered footnotes (citations) in vim? I have the vimfootnotes plugin, which works, but if I need to add or delete a footnote later I then have to continue to do everything by hand, which rather defetes the object. Any suggestions? Anthony This message has be

Re: Entering citations (footnotes) in vim

Actually, looking at the commands in the plugin script more carefully I see that it does allow you to change the numbering of the footnotes. I'd found this a long time ago but forgotten it. This makes it more usable, though some manual readjustment will still be required. This message has be

Can I delete this control sequence?

I've imported a lot of files from a DOS word processor. These have lots of control sequences of the form M-J ) New lines I think). I can search for the M, which is Return, but I don't see any way to get the -J. Is it possible? Anthony This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider

Re: Can I delete this control sequence?

On 13 Jan 2007, Tim Chase wrote: >I've imported a lot of files from a DOS word processor. >These have lots of control sequences of the form M-J ) New >lines I think). I can search for the M, which is Return, >but I don't see any way to get the -J. Is it possible? IIUC, you have CR/LF pairs in

Re: Can I delete this control sequence?

If you could, would it be possible to post an excerpt of a dump of the file through xxd/od? This will help determine exactly what the file contains at these junctures. Or, perhaps you can even determine from such output exactly what is following the CR. If it truly is a CR/LF pair, and your

Re: Can I delete this control sequence?

On 13 Jan 2007, Tim Chase wrote: >And, with xdd, I get > >arcadia:~/tmp:$ xxd extract >000: 200d 8a20 0d0a > >Is this any help? Ah...the most telling/helpful aspect! :) You might be able to use :%s/\r\%x8a//g (typed literally) to nuke those items, or replace them with your favori