Benjamin Fritz wrote:
A response to this thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/vim_use/browse_thread/thread/8532e7236f113ab7/a88235ef57bd1b5c
I have a prototype of what I think the final product should look like
(see attached) but sticking it into the actual code is proving more
Dominique Pelle wrote:
2008/12/16 Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net:
Matt Wozniski wrote:
function! ReturnArgs(...)
return a:000
endfunction
Seems to work fine?
echo ReturnArgs(1, 2, 3)
SEGV
echo string(ReturnArgs(1, 2, 3))
function! MakeArgsDict(...)
Hi
2008/12/17 David Fishburn dfishburn@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 6:46 am, Ben Schmidt mail_ben_schm...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
...
The other problem I saw with not using the fold column
was the fact that URLs
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before using netrw: tcq
formatoptions after using netrw: nroql2
method of netrw invocation:
nmap F11 :call MyExplore()CR
function! MyExplore()
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34 am, sc wrote:
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before using netrw: tcq
formatoptions after using netrw: nroql2
method of netrw
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 12:04 pm, Charles Campbell wrote:
sc wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34 am, sc wrote:
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before
Ben Schmidt wrote:
I have a prototype of what I think the final product should look like
(see attached) but sticking it into the actual code is proving more
difficult than I originally thought.
Hehe. That doesn't surprise me at all. That's why I was going to put it
on my to do list,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:40 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Dec 17, 6:46 am, Ben Schmidt mail_ben_schm...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
...
The other problem I saw with not using the fold column was the fact
that URLs are automatically converted to links by the script. I
envision
sc wrote:
i tried upgrading to v135g, and i changed formatoptions to
'tco' in my .vimrc to mirror your attempt
i used my 'vime' to start the session, selected a file, and
fo was 'tco' -- fine -- i used MyExplore to find and add
another buffer, fo was again 'tco' -- fine -- i used
MyExplore
Bram Moolenaar, 17.12.2008:
I think we don't need the foldcolumn in HTML. One can click on the fold
to open it, and on the text to close it again. That's a lot simpler and
removes the not-so-nice-looking fold column.
How do you solve the ambiguity problem when there are two folds
sc wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34 am, sc wrote:
charles--
again i find myself struggling to maintain my own
formatoptions settings through uses of netrw
netrw version: v134
formatoptions before using netrw: tcq
formatoptions after using netrw: nroql2
method of netrw
Tony Mechelynck wrote:
On 17/12/08 13:34, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Dominique Pelle wrote:
2008/12/16 Bram Moolenaarb...@moolenaar.net:
Matt Wozniski wrote:
function! ReturnArgs(...)
return a:000
endfunction
Seems to work fine?
echo ReturnArgs(1, 2, 3)
SEGV
Matt Wozniski wrote:
function! ReturnArgs(...)
return a:000
endfunction
Seems to work fine?
echo ReturnArgs(1, 2, 3)
SEGV
echo string(ReturnArgs(1, 2, 3))
function! MakeArgsDict(...)
return { 'args': a:000 }
endfunction
E685 Internal Error
echo
I have a prototype of what I think the final product should look like
(see attached) but sticking it into the actual code is proving more
difficult than I originally thought.
Hehe. That doesn't surprise me at all. That's why I was going to put it
on my to do list, and not attempt it for a
OK, I see the problem now...
Thank you for the script!
Chip Campbell
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I think we don't need the foldcolumn in HTML. One can click on the fold
to open it, and on the text to close it again. That's a lot simpler and
removes the not-so-nice-looking fold column.
How do you solve the ambiguity problem when there are two folds starting
on the same line without the
Here's a little patch that makes the indentation after if, else, and for
statements far less quirky.
Instead of:
if a b then
begin
FlagOK
end;
for i := 0 to 9 do
begin
UpdateRecord(i)
end;
*next-statement*
with my patch applied, it's:
if a b then
begin
On Wednesday 17 December 2008 3:14 pm, Charles Campbell wrote:
OK, I see the problem now...
Thank you for the script!
Chip Campbell
my pleasure -- i take it the ^Ms survived intact
let me know if there's anything more i can do to help...
sc
Ben Schmidt, 17.12.2008:
I think we don't need the foldcolumn in HTML. One can click on the fold
to open it, and on the text to close it again. That's a lot simpler and
removes the not-so-nice-looking fold column.
How do you solve the ambiguity problem when there are two folds
Problem:
The cursor position is not updated after deleting a fold based on
markers. This results in an invalid memory reference in some scenarios.
How to reproduce:
In normal mode perform zRgg$zdaa while editing a file with the following
contents:
[[[
blah blah blah
]]]
vim: fdm=marker
On 17/12/08 18:27, Markus Heidelberg wrote:
[...]
Without a foldcolumn, there is also no hint, whether some text belongs
to an open fold or not.
I think that's the decisive argument. Something prettier might be found
though; maybe a squared plus or minus sign x229E; x229F; or circled
x2295;
21 matches
Mail list logo
