>>> I think we don't need the foldcolumn in HTML. One can click on the fold >>> to open it, and on the text to close it again. That's a lot simpler and >>> removes the not-so-nice-looking fold column. >> How do you solve the ambiguity problem when there are two folds starting >> on the same line without the foldcolumn though (i.e. whether a click >> should open the second fold or close the first)? If they can appear >> beside each other in the foldcolumn, as in the prototype, that solves >> that problem quite nicely. I think. > > The same way it works for nested structures: first click opens the first > level, second click the second level, etc. > > For closing you would have to click on the text of the opened fold, not > a closed fold at the start of that fold.
What about if there is no such text? I.e. if every line of a fold is part of a subfold? Then you have the problem of an uncloseable fold with this interface (unless I misunderstand). I don't know how common the scenario would be for others, but it's certainly a very common case for me. Ben. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
