Re: [patch] filetype.vim

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Thilo Six wrote the following on 09.04.2011 22:20 Hello Bram, -- snip -- I'll include the change for messages, but the one for muttrc now has a pattern that ends in a star. That part should use s:StarSetf(), thus it needs to be split up. Thanks for your remarks. Find attached an

dirpager.vim

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Thilo Six
Hello Bram hello list, i have modified a vim syntax file originally written by Nikolai Weibull and i ask for it´s inclusion into vim runtime files. It purpose is to simulate '$ ls --color=auto' and it is used like this: $ ls -la | view -c set ft=dirpager - No patch to filetype.vim this time.

Re: Suggestion: change how [count]@{register} executes

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Ben Schmidt
So, what about executing 1000@@ as @@999@@ (where in turn 999@@ is executed as @@998@@ and so on ... and 2@@ as @@1@@ and 1@@ as @@ )? I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote about the issue earlier, but yes, of course, that's an obvious and simple way to implement it.

Re: [patch] match does not Conceal items

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi vim_dev! On Sa, 09 Apr 2011, Christian Brabandt wrote: problem is, you can't conceal items using :match or matchadd(). Attached patch fixes it: ... and this time, it even compiles with tiny features... regards, Christian -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not

Re: [patch] match does not Conceal items

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: Hi Bram, problem is, you can't conceal items using :match or matchadd(). Attached patch fixes it: Can you explain what the effect is? Perhaps we also need an update to the documentation. And an example to show the effect. Please use tabs where possible. +

Re: dirpager.vim

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: Hello Bram hello list, i have modified a vim syntax file originally written by Nikolai Weibull and i ask for it´s inclusion into vim runtime files. It purpose is to simulate '$ ls --color=auto' and it is used like this: $ ls -la | view -c set ft=dirpager - No patch

Re: [patch] filetype.vim

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Thilo Six wrote: I'll include the change for messages, but the one for muttrc now has a pattern that ends in a star. That part should use s:StarSetf(), thus it needs to be split up. Thanks for your remarks. Find attached an updated patch. Thanks. I'll include it. Note that we use au

Re: [patch] match does not Conceal items

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Christian Brabandt
Hi Bram! On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Can you explain what the effect is? Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for something like vertical folding. I tried to dynamically conceal columns using :call matchadd(), but this only highlights the region, it does

Re: Suggestion: change how [count]@{register} executes

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Ernie Rael
Could that change affect undo chunking? -ernie On 4/10/2011 4:46 AM, Ben Schmidt wrote: So, what about executing 1000@@ as @@999@@ (where in turn 999@@ is executed as @@998@@ and so on ... and 2@@ as @@1@@ and 1@@ as @@ )? I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote

Re: [patch] match does not Conceal items

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Christian Brabandt wrote: On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Can you explain what the effect is? Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for something like vertical folding. I tried to dynamically conceal columns using :call matchadd(), but this only

Re: Suggestion: change how [count]@{register} executes

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Bram Moolenaar
Ben Schmidt wrote: So, what about executing 1000@@ as @@999@@ (where in turn 999@@ is executed as @@998@@ and so on ... and 2@@ as @@1@@ and 1@@ as @@ )? I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote about the issue earlier, but yes, of course,

Re: [patch] match does not Conceal items

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Charles E Campbell Jr
Christian Brabandt wrote: Hi Bram! On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote: Can you explain what the effect is? Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for something like vertical folding. Perhaps you could look into foldcol.vim and see if that does what

Re: :list and :print move cursor

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Apr 9, 3:52 am, Andy Wokula anw...@yahoo.de wrote: These commands imply cursor movement, e.g.      20:list moves the cursor to the last printed line. The 'startofline' option applies. Is it really surprising that the cursor moves? I did not know that :20list moved the cursor. Now

Re: Suggestion: change how [count]@{register} executes

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie Ben Fritz
On Apr 10, 2:45 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote: You can't rely on the register not changing in the first @@, thus the following 999@@ may do something completely different.  Won't work. I think that might be part of the point of the proposal. But unless I'm wrong you can get

A patch for idlang.vim in syntax directory

2011-04-10 Fir de Conversatie H Xu
Hello, FOR should not be regarded as idlangRoutine. This is fixed in the attachment. Cannot get in touch with the maintainer. Regards, H Xu 2011/4/11 -- You received this message from the vim_dev maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more