Thilo Six wrote the following on 09.04.2011 22:20
Hello Bram,
-- snip --
I'll include the change for messages, but the one for muttrc now has a
pattern that ends in a star. That part should use s:StarSetf(), thus it
needs to be split up.
Thanks for your remarks. Find attached an
Hello Bram
hello list,
i have modified a vim syntax file originally written by Nikolai Weibull and i
ask for it´s inclusion into vim runtime files.
It purpose is to simulate '$ ls --color=auto' and it is used like this:
$ ls -la | view -c set ft=dirpager -
No patch to filetype.vim this time.
So, what about executing
1000@@
as
@@999@@
(where in turn 999@@ is executed as
@@998@@
and so on ... and 2@@ as
@@1@@
and 1@@ as
@@
)?
I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote about
the issue earlier, but yes, of course, that's an obvious and simple way
to implement it.
Hi vim_dev!
On Sa, 09 Apr 2011, Christian Brabandt wrote:
problem is, you can't conceal items using :match or matchadd().
Attached patch fixes it:
... and this time, it even compiles with tiny features...
regards,
Christian
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram,
problem is, you can't conceal items using :match or matchadd().
Attached patch fixes it:
Can you explain what the effect is? Perhaps we also need an update to
the documentation. And an example to show the effect.
Please use tabs where possible.
+
Thilo Six wrote:
Hello Bram
hello list,
i have modified a vim syntax file originally written by Nikolai Weibull and i
ask for it´s inclusion into vim runtime files.
It purpose is to simulate '$ ls --color=auto' and it is used like this:
$ ls -la | view -c set ft=dirpager -
No patch
Thilo Six wrote:
I'll include the change for messages, but the one for muttrc now has a
pattern that ends in a star. That part should use s:StarSetf(), thus it
needs to be split up.
Thanks for your remarks. Find attached an updated patch.
Thanks. I'll include it. Note that we use au
Hi Bram!
On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can you explain what the effect is?
Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for
something like vertical folding. I tried to dynamically conceal columns
using :call matchadd(), but this only highlights the region, it does
Could that change affect undo chunking?
-ernie
On 4/10/2011 4:46 AM, Ben Schmidt wrote:
So, what about executing
1000@@
as
@@999@@
(where in turn 999@@ is executed as
@@998@@
and so on ... and 2@@ as
@@1@@
and 1@@ as
@@
)?
I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote
Christian Brabandt wrote:
On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can you explain what the effect is?
Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for
something like vertical folding. I tried to dynamically conceal columns
using :call matchadd(), but this only
Ben Schmidt wrote:
So, what about executing
1000@@
as
@@999@@
(where in turn 999@@ is executed as
@@998@@
and so on ... and 2@@ as
@@1@@
and 1@@ as
@@
)?
I like the idea. Hadn't thought of using recursion when I wrote about
the issue earlier, but yes, of course,
Christian Brabandt wrote:
Hi Bram!
On So, 10 Apr 2011, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Can you explain what the effect is?
Basically, I wanted to create a plugin that uses concealing for
something like vertical folding.
Perhaps you could look into foldcol.vim and see if that does what
On Apr 9, 3:52 am, Andy Wokula anw...@yahoo.de wrote:
These commands imply cursor movement, e.g.
20:list
moves the cursor to the last printed line.
The 'startofline' option applies.
Is it really surprising that the cursor moves?
I did not know that :20list moved the cursor. Now
On Apr 10, 2:45 pm, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
You can't rely on the register not changing in the first @@, thus the
following 999@@ may do something completely different. Won't work.
I think that might be part of the point of the proposal. But unless
I'm wrong you can get
Hello,
FOR should not be regarded as idlangRoutine. This is fixed in the
attachment.
Cannot get in touch with the maintainer.
Regards,
H Xu
2011/4/11
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more
15 matches
Mail list logo