On Apr 10, 2:45 pm, Bram Moolenaar <[email protected]> wrote: > > You can't rely on the register not changing in the first @@, thus the > following 999@@ may do something completely different. Won't work. >
I think that might be part of the point of the proposal. But unless I'm wrong you can get that behavior by explicitly recording a recursive macro. -- You received this message from the "vim_dev" maillist. Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to. For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
