hi,
i originally started this thread on vim_use but
think it might have been better on vim_dev.
in short, is there any way i can get an x11/motif gvim-7.3.706+ not to
emit a large, ugly E250 message and continue prompt everytime it starts?
i include a little patch that i can resort to loocally
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
I can reproduce this with my gvim 7.3.46 (on linux vim 7.3.892 there's no
problem). I'll investigate and hopefully post a fix soon.
I found the problem and the solution.
Problem summary:
expand_path_option() leaves
On 18-Apr-2013 14:14 +0200, Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
I can reproduce this with my gvim 7.3.46 (on linux vim 7.3.892 there's no
problem). I'll investigate and hopefully post a fix soon.
I found the problem and the solution.
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:06, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Please note that for the root directory, C:\ is different than C: (which
means the current working directory of the C drive), so leaving off the
trailing path separator may cause problems in this case. (I haven't
checked your patch, but :echo
On 18-Apr-2013 15:15 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:06, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Please note that for the root directory, C:\ is different than C: (which
means the current working directory of the C drive), so leaving off the
trailing path separator may cause problems in
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:32, Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 18-Apr-2013 15:15 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:06, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Please note that for the root directory, C:\ is different than C:
(which
means the current working directory of the C drive), so leaving off
On 18-Apr-2013 15:15 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:32, Ingo Karkat wrote:
On 18-Apr-2013 15:15 +0200, Christian Brabandt wrote:
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:06, Ingo Karkat wrote:
Please note that for the root directory, C:\ is different than C:
(which
means the
On Thu, April 18, 2013 15:45, Ingo Karkat wrote:
It's not silly, you're just not used to it! (I started with CP/M and
MS-DOS 5; maybe I have a different perspective.)
That is the case. I started with MS-DOS 4.X and have never come across
that. But ok, may be it is just my expectation.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Ingo Karkat sw...@ingo-karkat.de wrote:
Please note that for the root directory, C:\ is different than C: (which
means the current working directory of the C drive), so leaving off the
trailing path separator may cause problems in this case. (I haven't
checked
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Nazri Ramliy ayieh...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the notice. I'll look into this again. My initial approach at
solving this was to replace all backslashes in the expanded path parts
into forward slashes but that seemed a bit too blankety of a solution
at that
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 4:20 PM, Dimitar DIMITROV mitk...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Dimitar wrote:
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com
wrote:
See image attached to my next message for what I see.
And please bottom-post.
Thanks Ben, can't see clearly your image
Hi,
I have recently learnt of a patch that was submitted to the list almost
five years ago. Please see here:
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/vim_dev/lR5rONDwgs8/iLsVCrxo_WsJ
The reception was positive but for some reason the discussion was
abandoned. I would like to reopen the discussion. I'd
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com
wrote:
See image attached to my next message for what I see.
And please bottom-post.
Thanks Ben, can't see clearly your image but maybe indeed the bug was
fixed in your version. Here is what I see (attached image)
Content
---
(1) Problem investigation
(2) Proposed solutions
(2.1) @ r...@raf.org
(2.2) @ Bram
Hi r...@raf.org!
On 2013-04-18 Thursday at 13:28 +1000 r...@raf.org wrote:
Roland Eggner wrote:
On 2013-04-17 Wednesday at 12:39 +1000 r...@raf.org wrote:
… …
test test92.in file
On 2013-04-18 Thursday at 19:36 +0200 Roland Eggner wrote:
Content
---
(1) Problem investigation
(2) Proposed solutions
(2.1) @ r...@raf.org
(2.2) @ Bram
Wrong file attached, sorry. Here is the intended “test92.in”.
--
Regards
Roland Eggner
vim: set ft=vim fenc=utf-8:
Tests if
Roland Eggner wrote:
Content
---
(1) Problem investigation
(2) Proposed solutions
(2.1) @ r...@raf.org
(2.2) @ Bram
[...]
(1) Problem investigation
--
(1.1) Looks everything ok on your side, apart from file “test92.in”, which
gots
mangled by
Hi Bram,
Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I have fixed the patch file now. No idea how this happened.
Even more strange, the test92.in file went missing in my source
directory. This doesn't make the tests fail, unfortunately.
With the new patch, test93.in seems to be encoded in utf-8 (not latin-1).
I'm new to this forum and hope I'm not missing basic etiquette rules here.
There is a discussion going on in the UNIX and Linux Forums UNIX for Dummies
Questions Answers forum titled Knowing when a different program modifies a
file (see
On Monday, October 15, 2012 3:43:30 AM UTC-4, aschneiderg wrote:
I understand they may result useful in some situations but I found them
annoying.
Replacing WS_EX_CLIENTEDGE with WS_EX_LEFT in gui_w32.c did the trick for the
top and left ones, but the bottom one is still there and the
On 19/04/13 00:31, Don Cragun wrote:
I'm new to this forum and hope I'm not missing basic etiquette rules here.
There is a discussion going on in the UNIX and Linux Forums UNIX for Dummies Questions
Answers forum titled Knowing when a different program modifies a file (see
I found problem of my patch. It doesn't work with here doc. I'll look into it.
On Monday, April 15, 2013 8:06:36 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Yasuhiro Matsumoto wrote:
When :py raise SystemExit, vim exit immediately. I know this is a spec
of python. But most of users don't want
I found problem of my patch. It doesn't work with here doc. I'll look into it.
I've updated.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You
On Thursday, April 18, 2013 3:52:30 PM UTC-5, vee...@veegee.org wrote:
On Monday, October 15, 2012 3:43:30 AM UTC-4, aschneiderg wrote:
I understand they may result useful in some situations but I found them
annoying.
Replacing WS_EX_CLIENTEDGE with WS_EX_LEFT in gui_w32.c did the
On Thursday, April 18, 2013 10:18:22 PM UTC-4, aschneiderg wrote:
Hey there.
Are your builds available online ? I would like to check them out.
All the best.
Uploaded for you guys. Couldn't find any 64-bit builds myself, might as well
save everyone else the trouble. It's also quite a
24 matches
Mail list logo
