I've tried creating a summary page which we can use to collect ideas
about what is good/bad and how to improve in the future:
http://vim-wiki.mawercer.de/wiki/topic/neobundle-vs-vam-merge
I think your plugin advantages are integration with VAM-kr contains
addon-info.json.
Shougo:
In install, neobundle don't care about install order.
But, if plugin activation(lazy loading), is not. But it is too difficult to
explain.
So eventually this could be of interest, too.
Does neobundle allow loading a plugin immediately?
Eg for VAM there are special options such as load-now so
So if you're talking about the real thing also say why something is
real and the other is not.
I meant that emulating will be a substitute. Since NeoBundle and VAM both
have unique features so neither can emulate the other. Emulating NeoBundle
in VAM won't be the real NeoBundle, as emulating VAM
A simple solution might be the one attached below. Don't know however, if there
are any side effects. Works for me.
--- x\main.c2013-12-30 13:27:49.756908800 +0100
+++ main.c 2013-12-30 13:22:35.739224000 +0100
@@ -3892,13 +3892,13 @@
}
/*
- * Build a :edit command to send to a Vim
Does neobundle allow loading a plugin immediately?
Eg for VAM there are special options such as load-now so that you can
even force loading the plugin/* files in .vimrc. Usual Vim behavior is
load all plugin/* files after .vimrc has been processed by Vim.
It is useful in some cases.
It seems be
Dominique Pellé wrote:
François Ingelrest wrote:
On 26 December 2013 17:54, Dominique Pellé wrote:
You need to:
- build vim with -g -O0
- make sure vim is not stripped (uncomment #STRIP = /bin/true
in vim/src/Makefile). Or run vim from the vim/src/. directory,
as it is not stripped
Cade Foster wrote:
Problem: vim does not open local directory.
Steps to reproduce:
1. run
$ vim /etc/
Expected results:
use netrw plug-in to list directory content.
Actual results:
1. show error message
/etc/ Illegal file name
2. buffer remains empty.
I'm unable to duplicate your
On 30-Dec-2013 Charles Campbell charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote:
Hello!
I'm using vim 7.4.131 (Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI), and
haven't used Dominque's patch. When trying your problem out, netrw
went up a directory, even though foo no longer existed; both
going-up-directory
Comment #1 on issue 189 by e...@raelity.com: Windows Vim installer
adds Edit with Vim to Explorer context menus, but not to web-browser
context menus
http://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=189
1. Windows Explorer integration: Edit with Vim
2. Web browser integration: Text Editor
Excerpts from Marcel Boon's message of Mon Dec 30 16:19:51 +0100 2013:
I looked at Zimba and it looks really promising, but it is in early stage.
Why do you think what you have in mind isn't possible with Zimbu? A
- compile time hackery like meta programming. Eg have a look at haxes or
Scalas
On 2013-12-30, Charles Campbell wrote:
Cade Foster wrote:
Problem: vim does not open local directory.
Steps to reproduce:
1. run
$ vim /etc/
Expected results:
use netrw plug-in to list directory content.
Actual results:
1. show error message
/etc/ Illegal file name
2.
On 30-Dec-2013 13:36 +0100, Axel Bender wrote:
A simple solution might be the one attached below. Don't know however,
if there are any side effects. Works for me.
Unlike :edit, the :drop command adds the file to the argument list. I'd
say that's an unexpected side effect.
[42 lines deleted]
Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2013-12-30, Charles Campbell wrote:
Cade Foster wrote:
Problem: vim does not open local directory.
Steps to reproduce:
1. run
$ vim /etc/
Expected results:
use netrw plug-in to list directory content.
Actual results:
1. show error message
/etc/ Illegal file name
Lech Lorens wrote:
On 30-Dec-2013 Charles Campbell charles.e.campb...@nasa.gov wrote:
Hello!
I'm using vim 7.4.131 (Huge version with GTK2-GNOME GUI), and
haven't used Dominque's patch. When trying your problem out, netrw
went up a directory, even though foo no longer existed; both
Excerpts from Adrien Piérard's message of Mon Dec 30 20:32:05 +0100 2013:
A good example would be FreeBSD's ports, for which there exist several
clients like portupgrade, porteasy, etc. This system has proved
usable and used for long enough to be worth studying.
Yes, and gentoo portage, ruby's
Sorry I didn't look at the links.
My point was not that VAM or NeoBundle or anything else was better and
should take over, but more that maybe we should rethink the way
plugins are defined. Maybe it's high times plugins actually declare
dependencies, where to be downloaded from, etc, so as to make
On 2013-12-30, Charles Campbell wrote:
Gary Johnson wrote:
On 2013-12-30, Charles Campbell wrote:
Please run the internal debugger (:he netrw-debug) and send me a
trace.
I will try to get that later today.
I'll take a look when you get the trace. That entire sequence of
commands worked
how often do you see a howto that instructs you to edit a config file for a 1
line change?
I'd love to see an enhancement that would convert the vim edit history to an ex
command line invocation. It should automatically try and determine a string
that would uniquely identify each line changed
18 matches
Mail list logo
