Hello!
I got really excited about one discovery, so I'd like to start a discussion and
see if there is a possible fit into vim's feature roadmap.
So, apparently all modern terminals have a feature to tell programs when
something is pasted.
Terminal does this by wrapping the paste content with
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 12:49 AM, Ben Fritz fritzophre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 11:24:50 PM UTC-5, Yukihiro Nakadaira wrote:
Here is sample code.
[edited]
L = luaL_newstate();
lua_pushcclosure(L, add, 0);
lua_pushinteger(L, 111);
Patch attached.
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit http://www.vim.org/maillist.php
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
vim_dev
I'm not sure if this ever worked, but I noticed today that with
'cursorline' set, there is no highlight on lines that have DiffChange
highlighting.
Moving the cursor to a line without DiffChange highlighting makes the
cursor visible again.
I think this is a bug; it makes cursorline much less
Hi Bram!
On Do, 10 Jul 2014, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
I do not really like the idea of two versions of the .ok file. It's a
new mechanism and will easily confuse me. Does testing without utf-8
have a good purpose? Then I would prefer to split this up in two
tests, so that when utf-8 is
Bruno Sutic wrote:
I got really excited about one discovery, so I'd like to start a
discussion and see if there is a possible fit into vim's feature
roadmap.
So, apparently all modern terminals have a feature to tell programs
when something is pasted.
Terminal does this by wrapping the
On Friday, July 11, 2014 11:35:24 PM UTC+2, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Bruno Sutic wrote:
I got really excited about one discovery, so I'd like to start a
discussion and see if there is a possible fit into vim's feature
roadmap.
So, apparently all modern terminals have a
On Thursday, July 10, 2014 6:56:32 PM UTC+9, Bram Moolenaar wrote:
Hmm, I would not expect any slow down because of this patch. Are you
sure it's not something else? Ideally you would reverse this specific
patch and check if the excessive CPU still happens.
Bram, apologies for sending
MatchParen uses knowledge of how the character under the cursor is
highlighted to help guide its matching. However, it is only looking at
the top-most item in the syntax stack, which may not match the patterns
being checked.
The behavior of matchparen in the following zsh script demonstrates the
What do you think about supressing events in the specific way I described
above? Is it possible without a lot of work? Could it be problematic for some
reasonable use case?
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are
10 matches
Mail list logo
