Will this get fixed, or did I miss something?
Not ok here with 7.4.811.
This is not a push, just a question :()
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type your reply below the text you are replying to.
For more information, visit
Am 2015-08-05 10:54, schrieb Axel Bender:
Will this get fixed, or did I miss something?
Not ok here with 7.4.811.
This is not a push, just a question :()
Was not yet commited. I am sure, Bram will push a fix soon.
Best,Christian
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
On 04-Aug-15, Olaf Dabrunz wrote:
There is no simple way to prepare a file name parameter for bufnr() so
that it reliably finds a specific buffer.
The file name can contain file-pattern characters that can lead to more
than one match, or a match attempt in buflist_findpat() can find a
Hello,
If I understand correctly, undo won't be broken as long as we move the cursor
with left, right, and so on.
Will it be possible to also support moves based on search() and searchpair() ?
--
Luc Hermitte
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev maillist.
Do not top-post! Type
Am 2015-08-05 11:25, schrieb hermi...@free.fr:
If I understand correctly, undo won't be broken as long as we move the
cursor with left, right, and so on.
(and the cursor stays in the same line)
Will it be possible to also support moves based on search() and
searchpair() ?
Too complicated.
For search and searchpair, you should be able to call those *without* moving
the cursor to get a position, and then (if it's in the same line) generate
movement sequences to get there. Not exactly elegant but it should work (for
single lines).
--
--
You received this message from the vim_dev
For search and searchpair, you should be able to call those *without*
moving the cursor to get a position, and then (if it's in the same
line) generate movement sequences to get there. Not exactly elegant
but it should work (for single lines).
I was expecting to be able to exploit the patch
Hi Dmytro!
On Di, 04 Aug 2015, Dmytro Konstantinov wrote:
Hi Christian!
Thanks for getting back to me!
On Tuesday, August 4, 2015 at 6:35:55 PM UTC+1, Christian Brabandt wrote:
I am nut sure, I understand fully. How do you suggest to change the
cursor positioning?
I'm afraid I
Hi hermitte!
On Mi, 05 Aug 2015, hermi...@free.fr wrote:
Of course, it's stupid to redo the exact same control-statement,
and yet, it would have been useful in some copy-paste like cases.
Well, I wouldn't call it stupid exactly, that the mapping isn't done
redone completely and can see, that
Luc Hermitte wrote:
If I understand correctly, undo won't be broken as long as we move the
cursor with left, right, and so on.
Will it be possible to also support moves based on search() and
searchpair() ?
That goes in the direction of merging two undo actions. That's
basically making u
Justin M Keyes wrote:
Via John Whitley:
Git 2.5 adds a new command git worktree, providing first-class
support for multiple working directories (aka worktrees) per
repository. An update to filetype.vim is needed the gitcommit filetype
paths for the new secondary worktree locations. See
The command zt, which scrolls the current line to the top of the
screen, does not always work in a window that's in diff mode.
Depending on the line that the cursor is on, it either works
correctly, scrolls the current line part way up the screen, or has
no effect at all.
Here is an example,
Status: New
Owner:
Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium
New issue 391 by ruby.bar...@gmail.com: Kindle
https://code.google.com/p/vim/issues/detail?id=391
What steps will reproduce the problem?
1.
2.
3.
What is the expected output? What do you see instead?
What version of the product are
On Wednesday, August 5, 2015 at 11:55:12 AM UTC-5, hermi...@free.fr wrote:
For search and searchpair, you should be able to call those *without*
moving the cursor to get a position, and then (if it's in the same
line) generate movement sequences to get there. Not exactly elegant
but it
Hi Nazri
On 2015-07-05 Sunday at 09:39 +0800 Nazri Ramliy wrote:
On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 9:23 PM, Bram Moolenaar b...@moolenaar.net wrote:
When running the tests the terminal produces beeps.
Usually this is caused by the test script having a line break,
which is the command to move to the
15 matches
Mail list logo
