I'd like to push this issue as it's giving me some hard time to define my
syntax items appropiately.
As fas as I can see it, there's no way that GVim interprets NONE as
transparent, thus requiring the user to repeat syntax definitions where that
should not be necessary.
Would appreciate any
The docs state:
There are a few special names: ... NONE no color (transparent)
however NONE is always interpreted as background, not as transparent. This
prohibits us from using the current (the most interior) background (or
foreground) colors of enclosing syntax items (see attached files;
